These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16647289)

  • 21. Why plant volatile analysis needs bioinformatics--detecting signal from noise in increasingly complex profiles.
    van Dam NM; Poppy GM
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2008 Jan; 10(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 18211546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro antimicrobial activity of volatile organic compounds from Muscodor crispans against the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum.
    Krajaejun T; Lowhnoo T; Yingyong W; Rujirawat T; Fucharoen S; Strobel GA
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2012 Nov; 43(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 23413712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Untapped mutualistic paradigms linking host plant and endophytic fungal production of similar bioactive secondary metabolites.
    Kusari S; Pandey SP; Spiteller M
    Phytochemistry; 2013 Jul; 91():81-7. PubMed ID: 22954732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic fungi: hope versus hype.
    Kusari S; Singh S; Jayabaskaran C
    Trends Biotechnol; 2014 Jun; 32(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 24703621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Muscodor fengyangensis sp. nov. from southeast China: morphology, physiology and production of volatile compounds.
    Zhang CL; Wang GP; Mao LJ; Komon-Zelazowska M; Yuan ZL; Lin FC; Druzhinina IS; Kubicek CP
    Fungal Biol; 2010 Oct; 114(10):797-808. PubMed ID: 20943189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes.
    Yu H; Zhang L; Li L; Zheng C; Guo L; Li W; Sun P; Qin L
    Microbiol Res; 2010 Aug; 165(6):437-49. PubMed ID: 20116229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Endophytic Fungal Volatile Compounds as Solution for Sustainable Agriculture.
    Kaddes A; Fauconnier ML; Sassi K; Nasraoui B; Jijakli MH
    Molecules; 2019 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 30889913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Muscodor albus E-6, an endophyte of Guazuma ulmifolia making volatile antibiotics: isolation, characterization and experimental establishment in the host plant.
    Strobel GA; Kluck K; Hess WM; Sears J; Ezra D; Vargas PN
    Microbiology (Reading); 2007 Aug; 153(Pt 8):2613-2620. PubMed ID: 17660425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mycofumigation through production of the volatile DNA-methylating agent
    Hutchings ML; Alpha-Cobb CJ; Hiller DA; Berro J; Strobel SA
    J Biol Chem; 2017 May; 292(18):7358-7371. PubMed ID: 28283571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chemical and functional diversity of natural products from plant associated endophytic fungi.
    Verma VC; Kharwar RN; Strobel GA
    Nat Prod Commun; 2009 Nov; 4(11):1511-32. PubMed ID: 19967984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of volatile organic compounds from Streptomyces albulus NJZJSA2 on growth of two fungal pathogens.
    Wu Y; Yuan J; E Y; Raza W; Shen Q; Huang Q
    J Basic Microbiol; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1104-17. PubMed ID: 26059065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization and Synergistic Effect of Antifungal Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by the Geotrichum candidum PF005, an Endophytic Fungus from the Eggplant.
    Mookherjee A; Bera P; Mitra A; Maiti MK
    Microb Ecol; 2018 Apr; 75(3):647-661. PubMed ID: 28894891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hydrophobic response of the fungus Rhinocladiella similis in the biofiltration with volatile organic compounds with different polarity.
    Vigueras G; Arriaga S; Shirai K; Morales M; Revah S
    Biotechnol Lett; 2009 Aug; 31(8):1203-9. PubMed ID: 19343504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of coumarin derivatives as anti-fungal agents against soil-borne fungal pathogens.
    Brooker NL; Kuzimichev Y; Laas J; Pavlis R
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(4):785-93. PubMed ID: 18396811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bioactive metabolites from the endophytic fungus Ampelomyces sp. isolated from the medicinal plant Urospermum picroides.
    Aly AH; Edrada-Ebel R; Wray V; Müller WE; Kozytska S; Hentschel U; Proksch P; Ebel R
    Phytochemistry; 2008 May; 69(8):1716-25. PubMed ID: 18400237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications.
    Ryan RP; Germaine K; Franks A; Ryan DJ; Dowling DN
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2008 Jan; 278(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18034833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The potential of the fungus, Muscodor albus, as a microbial control agent of potato tuber moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in stored potatoes.
    Lacey LA; Neven LG
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2006 Mar; 91(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16494898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of biofumigation with volatiles from Muscodor albus on the viability of Tilletia spp. teliospores.
    Goates BJ; Mercier J
    Can J Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 19295653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Muscodor brasiliensis sp. nov. produces volatile organic compounds with activity against Penicillium digitatum.
    Pena LC; Jungklaus GH; Savi DC; Ferreira-Maba L; Servienski A; Maia BHLNS; Annies V; Galli-Terasawa LV; Glienke C; Kava V
    Microbiol Res; 2019 Apr; 221():28-35. PubMed ID: 30825939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.