93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16647351)
1. Outcomes among women younger than age 40 in a state breast cancer screening program.
Vetto JT; Wheeler AJ; Toomey M; Schmidt KJ
Am J Surg; 2006 May; 191(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 16647351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preliminary results and analysis of the feasibility of mammographic breast cancer screening in women younger than 50 years of the Ariana area in Tunisia].
Zaanouni E; Ben Abdallah M; Bouchlaka A; Ben Aissa R; Kribi L; M'barek F; Ben Hamida A; Boussen H; Gueddana N
Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):443-9. PubMed ID: 20063677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer incidence after the introduction of mammography screening: what should be expected?
Svendsen AL; Olsen AH; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer; 2006 May; 106(9):1883-90. PubMed ID: 16572411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI screening in a clinic population with a family history of breast cancer.
Yu J; Park A; Morris E; Liberman L; Borgen PI; King TA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):452-61. PubMed ID: 18026801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Results and evaluation of 3 years of a large scale mammography program in the Ariana area of Tunisia].
Bouchlaka A; Ben Abdallah M; Ben Aissa R; Zaanouni E; Kribi L; Smida S; M'barek F; Ben Hamida A; Boussen H; Gueddana N
Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):438-42. PubMed ID: 20063676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targeted breast cancer screening in women younger than 40: results from a statewide program.
Sarff M; Schmidt K; Vetto JT
Am J Surg; 2008 May; 195(5):626-30; discussion 630. PubMed ID: 18374894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of breast cancer-related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme.
Brain K; Henderson BJ; Tyndel S; Bankhead C; Watson E; Clements A; Austoker J;
Psychooncology; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1180-8. PubMed ID: 18506670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
Warner E
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a community-based intervention to enhance breast cancer screening practices in Brazil.
Thuler LC; Freitas HG
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18759754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008.
Armour BS; Thierry JM; Wolf LA
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screen-detected invasive cervical carcinoma and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening.
Herbert A; Anshu ; Gregory M; Gupta SS; Singh N
BJOG; 2009 May; 116(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 19371308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Incidence and prognostic factors of breast cancer diagnosed within and outside of the organised screening program in the department of Loire-Atlantique (1991-2002)].
Molinié F; Billon-Delacour S; Allioux C; Blais S; Bercelli P; Lombrail P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Feb; 56(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18295424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Acute situation in the National Program of Breast Cancer Screening in the Czech Republic].
Svobodník A; Danes J; Skovajsová M; Bartonková H; Májek O; Klimes D
Cas Lek Cesk; 2007; 146(12):945-9. PubMed ID: 18257412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory.
Price J; Chen SW
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19453531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in breast cancer at a county hospital.
Hoehne FM; Taylor E
Am Surg; 2005 Feb; 71(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 16022017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
