232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16648066)
1. Characterization of the relationship between preshock state and virtual electrode polarization-induced propagated graded responses resulting in arrhythmia induction.
Bourn DW; Gray RA; Trayanova NA
Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 16648066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shock-induced epicardial and endocardial virtual electrodes leading to ventricular fibrillation via reentry, graded responses, and transmural activation.
Evans FG; Gray RA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15028078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tunnel propagation of postshock activations as a hypothesis for fibrillation induction and isoelectric window.
Ashihara T; Constantino J; Trayanova NA
Circ Res; 2008 Mar; 102(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 18218982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction by strong cardiac shocks: can understanding underlying mechanisms lead to improved prevention of defibrillator failure?
Nattel S
Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):596-7. PubMed ID: 16648067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.
Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Activation sequences following failed atrial defibrillation.
Zheng X; Huang J; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Heart Rhythm; 2004 Nov; 1(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 15851229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.
Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Sweeney MB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Clin Invest; 1986 Mar; 77(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 3949979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of intramural virtual electrodes in shock-induced activation of left ventricle: optical measurements from the intact epicardial surface.
Sharifov OF; Fast VG
Heart Rhythm; 2006 Sep; 3(9):1063-73. PubMed ID: 16945803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.
Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transmural and endocardial Purkinje activation in pigs before local myocardial activation after defibrillation shocks.
Dosdall DJ; Cheng KA; Huang J; Allison JS; Allred JD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Heart Rhythm; 2007 Jun; 4(6):758-65. PubMed ID: 17556199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional mapping of earliest activation after near-threshold ventricular defibrillation shocks.
Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Chattipakorn SC; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12625612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation.
Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Van Wagoner DR; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Circ Res; 1999 Nov; 85(11):1056-66. PubMed ID: 10571537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual electrode, graded responses, reentry, breakthrough, and undetermined:
Lin SF
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):88-9. PubMed ID: 15028079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.
Efimov IR; Cheng YN; Biermann M; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev TN; Tchou PJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):1031-45. PubMed ID: 9300301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intracellular calcium and vulnerability to fibrillation and defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit ventricles.
Hwang GS; Hayashi H; Tang L; Ogawa M; Hernandez H; Tan AY; Li H; Karagueuzian HS; Weiss JN; Lin SF; Chen PS
Circulation; 2006 Dec; 114(24):2595-603. PubMed ID: 17116770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.
Efimov IR; Aguel F; Cheng Y; Wollenzier B; Trayanova N
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2000 Sep; 279(3):H1055-70. PubMed ID: 10993768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs.
Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H891-901. PubMed ID: 3177678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of pinacidil on postshock activation and ventricular defibrillation threshold in canine hearts.
Jin Q; Zhang N; Zhou J; Lin CJ; Pang Y; Gu G; Shen WF; Wu LQ
Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1488-94. PubMed ID: 23064720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
