259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16648501)
21. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country.
Lin HC; Xirasagar S; Lee HC; Chai CY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1182-8. PubMed ID: 16897270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons.
Guru KA; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Hussain A; Chandrasekhar R; Piacente P; Bienko M; Glasgow M; Underwood W; Wilding G; Mohler JL; Menon M; Peabody JO
Can J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(4):4736-41; discussion 4741. PubMed ID: 19671225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy.
Barocas DA; Mitchell R; Chang SS; Cookson MS
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 19395287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contemporary trends of in-hospital complications and mortality for radical cystectomy.
Kim SP; Boorjian SA; Shah ND; Karnes RJ; Weight CJ; Moriarty JP; Tollefson MK; Shippee ND; Frank I
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 22443271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient outcomes and length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: analysis of hospital episodes statistics for England.
Judge A; Evans S; Gunnell DJ; Albertsen PC; Verne J; Martin RM
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1040-9. PubMed ID: 17784890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes.
Varadarajulu S; Kilgore ML; Wilcox CM; Eloubeidi MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 16923479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.
Joseph B; Morton JM; Hernandez-Boussard T; Rubinfeld I; Faraj C; Velanovich V
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 19476785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.
Gasper WJ; Glidden DV; Jin C; Way LW; Patti MG
Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):472-83. PubMed ID: 19730178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Provision of radical pelvic urological surgery in England, and compliance with improving outcomes guidance.
Mayer EK; Bottle A; Darzi AW; Athanasiou T; Vale JA
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1446-51. PubMed ID: 19549126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Trends in regionalization of inpatient care for urological malignancies, 1988 to 2002.
Cooperberg MR; Modak S; Konety BR
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2103-8; discussion 2108. PubMed ID: 17870128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Higher hospital volume is associated with lower mortality in acute nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage.
Ananthakrishnan AN; McGinley EL; Saeian K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Sep; 70(3):422-32. PubMed ID: 19560760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.
Finlayson EV; Goodney PP; Birkmeyer JD
Arch Surg; 2003 Jul; 138(7):721-5; discussion 726. PubMed ID: 12860752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors for mortality and morbidity related to radical cystectomy.
Boström PJ; Kössi J; Laato M; Nurmi M
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 18671789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.
Urbach DR; Baxter NN
Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Oct; 13(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15465942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Getting under the hood of the volume-outcome relationship for radical cystectomy.
Hollenbeck BK; Daignault S; Dunn RL; Gilbert S; Weizer AZ; Miller DC
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2095-9; discussion 2099. PubMed ID: 17509295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Misclassification of hospital volume with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data.
Hollenbeck BK; Hong Ji ; Zaojun Ye ; Birkmeyer JD
Surg Innov; 2007 Sep; 14(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 17928618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hospital volume and stroke outcome: does it matter?
Saposnik G; Baibergenova A; O'Donnell M; Hill MD; Kapral MK; Hachinski V;
Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1142-51. PubMed ID: 17634420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter?
Browne JA; Pietrobon R; Olson SA
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):809-14. PubMed ID: 19276758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Goshima KR; Mills JL; Awari K; Pike SL; Hughes JD
Ann Vasc Surg; 2008; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 18411029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Specialized care and survival of ovarian cancer patients in The Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.
Vernooij F; Heintz AP; Witteveen PO; van der Heiden-van der Loo M; Coebergh JW; van der Graaf Y
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 18334710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
