These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16650270)

  • 1. Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval.
    Milasinovic G; Sperzel J; Smith TW; Mead H; Brandt J; Haisty WK; Bailey JR; Roelke M; Simonson J; Gerritse B; Englund J; Compton SJ;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 29(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 16650270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with dual-chamber ICDs.
    Olshansky B; Day J; McGuire M; Hahn S; Brown S; Lerew DR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 29(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16606390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction using an enhanced search AV algorithm.
    Melzer C; Sowelam S; Sheldon TJ; Bondke HJ; Baumann G; Combs B; Theres H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 15955184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two strategies to reduce ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients.
    Pürerfellner H; Brandt J; Israel C; Sheldon T; Johnson J; Tscheliessnigg K; Sperzel J; Boriani G; Puglisi A; Milasinovic G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18233969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
    Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
    Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.
    Pakarinen S; Toivonen L
    Ann Med; 2013 Sep; 45(5-6):438-45. PubMed ID: 23768003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe atrioventricular decoupling, uncoupling, and ventriculoatrial coupling during enhanced atrial pacing: incidence, mechanisms, and implications for minimizing right ventricular pacing in ICD patients.
    Sweeney MO; Ellenbogen KA; Tang AS; Johnson J; Belk P; Sheldon T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1175-80. PubMed ID: 18554192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atrial threshold variability: implications for automatic atrial stimulation algorithms.
    Biffi M; Spitali G; Silvetti MS; Argnani S; Rubino I; Fontana P; Barbato G; Mazzini E; De Santo T; Drago F; Boriani G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1445-54. PubMed ID: 18070297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AAIsafeR limits ventricular pacing in unselected patients.
    Pioger G; Leny G; Nitzsché R; Ripart A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 17302721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias.
    Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 35(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22339661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal sensed atrio-ventricular interval determined by paced QRS morphology.
    Van Gelder BM; Bracke FA; Van Der Voort PH; Meijer A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Apr; 30(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 17437570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.
    Bauer A; Vermeulen J; Toivonen L; Voitk J; Barr C; Peytchev P
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 26(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 26315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.
    Chen KP; Xu G; Wu S; Tang B; Wang L; Zhang S;
    Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23243132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Managed Ventricular pacing versus VVI 40 Pacing (MVP) Trial: clinical background, rationale, design, and implementation.
    Sweeney MO; Ellenbogen KA; Miller EH; Sherfesee L; Sheldon T; Whellan D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1295-8. PubMed ID: 17081208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing on ventricular repolarization in normal-heart individuals and patients with congestive heart failure.
    Bai R; Yang XY; Song Y; Lin L; Lü JG; Ching CK; Pu J; Kam R; Hsu LF; Zhang CT; Teo WS; Wang L
    Europace; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1002-10. PubMed ID: 17043073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managed ventricular pacing vs. conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacements: the PreFER MVP study: clinical background, rationale, and design.
    Quesada A; Botto G; Erdogan A; Kozak M; Lercher P; Nielsen JC; Piot O; Ricci R; Weiss C; Becker D; Wetzels G; De Roy L;
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 18308753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
    Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 11228853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different pacing algorithms on cumulative ventricular pacing proportion in patients with pacemakers.
    Xiao CH; Zhang XW; Wang RX; Cheng YL; Zhang CY; Wang LB; Yang WF; Yang XJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Sep; 124(18):2937-42. PubMed ID: 22040506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percent ventricular pacing with managed ventricular pacing mode in standard pacemaker population.
    Milasinovic G; Tscheliessnigg K; Boehmer A; Vancura V; Schuchert A; Brandt J; Wiggenhorn C; Hofman M; Sperzel J
    Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 18203737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.