These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16650292)
1. A new nomogram to predict pathologic outcome following radical prostatectomy. Crippa A; Srougi M; Dall'Oglio MF; Antunes AA; Leite KR; Nesrallah LJ; Ortiz V Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 16650292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and highest biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the Center for Prostate Disease Research nomograms. Gancarczyk KJ; Wu H; McLeod DG; Kane C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW Urology; 2003 Mar; 61(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 12639653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. Egan AJ; Bostwick DG Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases. Sebo TJ; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Myers RP; Blute ML; Zincke H Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2196-204. PubMed ID: 11391602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Correlation of the anatomo-pathological staging of radical prostatectomy specimens with the amount of cancer in the preoperative sextant biopsy]. Ojea Calvo A; Núñez López A; Domínguez Freire F; Alonso Rodrigo A; Rodríguez Iglesias B; Benavente Delgado J; Barros Rodríguez JM; Gómez-González MC; González Piñeiro A; Otero García M; Nogueira March JL Actas Urol Esp; 2003 Jun; 27(6):428-37. PubMed ID: 12918149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era. Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and external validation of a biopsy-derived nomogram to predict risk of ipsilateral extraprostatic extension. Sayyid R; Perlis N; Ahmad A; Evans A; Toi A; Horrigan M; Finelli A; Zlotta A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Morash C; Fleshner N BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 27930844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T; J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Makarov DV; Trock BJ; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Partin AW Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 17572194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens. Satake N; Ohori M; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Miyakawa A; Hatano T; Tachibana M Int J Urol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 20132361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection. Gao X; Mohideen N; Flanigan RC; Waters WB; Wojcik EM; Leman CR J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1982-6. PubMed ID: 11061896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preoperative parameters, including percent of positive biopsy cores, in predicting pathological findings after radical prostatectomy]. Inagaki T; Kohjimoto Y; Hagino K; Kuramoto T; Mori T; Kikkawa K; Iba A; Uekado Y; Shinka T Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Mar; 98(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 17419367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion. Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Brenner PC; Kooner R; Golovsky D; O'Neill GF; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1884-93. PubMed ID: 12673714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen. San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]