136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16650495)
1. Distinct mechanisms for planning keypress and reaching responses: a developmental study.
Adam JJ; Parthoens S; Pratt J
Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 16650495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motor set modulates automatic priming effects of uninformative cues.
Adam JJ; Pratt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 18280449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks.
Adam JJ; Pratt J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1092-106. PubMed ID: 15584817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context.
Vaidya CJ; Huger M; Howard DV; Howard JH
Neuropsychology; 2007 Jul; 21(4):497-506. PubMed ID: 17605582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cognitive interference and aging: insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task.
Juncos-Rabadán O; Pereiro AX; Facal D
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17601480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of spatial information in advance task-set control: an event-related potential study.
Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(7):1404-18. PubMed ID: 18973567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of preparatory schema on the speed of responses to spatially compatible and incompatible stimuli.
Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Van der Veen FM; Debski KB
Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 12212642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: dissociations in accessing the mental number line.
Priftis K; Zorzi M; Meneghello F; Marenzi R; Umiltà C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 16768369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding developmental changes in the stability and flexibility of spatial categories based on object relatedness.
Hund AM; Foster EK
Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):218-32. PubMed ID: 18194020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual, premotor and motor factors in the performance of a delayed-reaching task by subjects with unilateral spatial neglect.
Shimodozono M; Matsumoto S; Miyata R; Etoh S; Tsujio S; Kawahira K
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1752-64. PubMed ID: 16650879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateralized contribution of prefrontal cortex in controlling task-irrelevant information during verbal and spatial working memory tasks: rTMS evidence.
Sandrini M; Rossini PM; Miniussi C
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2056-63. PubMed ID: 18336847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Switching between tasks and responses: a developmental study.
Crone EA; Bunge SA; van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR
Dev Sci; 2006 May; 9(3):278-87. PubMed ID: 16669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
Bryden PJ; Roy EA
Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid motor responses are appropriately tuned to the metrics of a visuospatial task.
Pruszynski JA; Kurtzer I; Scott SH
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):224-38. PubMed ID: 18463184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Numbers are represented in egocentric space: effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements.
Conson M; Mazzarella E; Trojano L
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Mar; 452(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 19383434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanisms of deficit of visuospatial attention shift in children with developmental coordination disorder: a neurophysiological measure of the endogenous Posner paradigm.
Tsai CL; Pan CY; Cherng RJ; Hsu YW; Chiu HH
Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 19751962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between tactile spatial resolution and digital dexterity during childhood.
Bleyenheuft Y; Wilmotte P; Thonnard JL
Somatosens Mot Res; 2010; 27(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 20141405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
