1181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16650679)
1. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.
Gonzalez ME; Gonzalez C; Stern MP; Arredondo B; Martinez S
Arch Med Res; 1995; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 7620277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.
Strøm C; Sander B; Larsen N; Larsen M; Lund-Andersen H
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11773037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.
Abràmoff MD; Folk JC; Han DP; Walker JD; Williams DF; Russell SR; Massin P; Cochener B; Gain P; Tang L; Lamard M; Moga DC; Quellec G; Niemeijer M
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 23494039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Software for reading and grading diabetic retinopathy: Aravind Diabetic Retinopathy Screening 3.0.
Perumalsamy N; Prasad NM; Sathya S; Ramasamy K
Diabetes Care; 2007 Sep; 30(9):2302-6. PubMed ID: 17507695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6753-61. PubMed ID: 20574011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative system to evaluate diabetic retinopathy from fundus photographs.
Feman SS; Leonard-Martin TC; Andrews JS; Armbruster CC; Burdge TL; Debelak JD; Lanier A; Fischer AG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 36(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 7822145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
