These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16651011)

  • 1. Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres.
    Grimm S; Roeber U; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 16651011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-attentive and attentive processing of temporal and frequency characteristics within long sounds.
    Grimm S; Schröger E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 16253485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system.
    Grimm S; Schröger E
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):241-9. PubMed ID: 17943002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The representation of unattended, segmented sounds: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Weise A; Ritter W; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Aug; 81(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 21600937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A temporal constraint for automatic deviance detection and object formation: A mismatch negativity study.
    Weise A; Grimm S; Müller D; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1331():88-95. PubMed ID: 20307508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-attentive spectro-temporal feature processing in the human auditory system.
    Zaehle T; Jancke L; Herrmann CS; Meyer M
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep; 22(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 19266276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence.
    Doeller CF; Opitz B; Mecklinger A; Krick C; Reith W; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):1270-82. PubMed ID: 14568496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal processing ability is related to ear-asymmetry for detecting time cues in sound: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J; Finch B; Smith E; Budd TW; Schall U
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21040739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive processing of spectral, temporal, and structural characteristics of acoustic regularities: a mismatch negativity study.
    Takegata R; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 11321624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The temporal window of integration in elderly and young adults.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Winkler I; Teder-Sälejärvi WA
    Neurobiol Aging; 2007 Jun; 28(6):964-75. PubMed ID: 16793177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fusion of unattended duration representations as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Pfingst KA; McKenzie DN
    Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 1435():118-29. PubMed ID: 22197031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which kind of transition is important for sound representation? An event-related potential study.
    Weise A; Bendixen A; Müller D; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1464():30-42. PubMed ID: 22613810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects.
    Takegata R; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Varyagina O; Näätänen R; Winkler I
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 15953710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of sensory memory reflected by mismatch negativity and its clinical application].
    Yabe H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2004; 106(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 15049124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory deviance detection revisited: evidence for a hierarchical novelty system.
    Grimm S; Escera C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 21669238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
    Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.