179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16651220)
1. Measurement and analyses of the effects of adjacent end plate curvatures on vertebral stresses.
Langrana NA; Kale SP; Edwards WT; Lee CK; Kopacz KJ
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 16651220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influences of disc degeneration and bone mineral density on the structural properties of lumbar end plates.
Hou Y; Yuan W
Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 22366078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis.
Chiang MF; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Cheng CK; Shih SL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E682-9. PubMed ID: 16946641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Fantigrossi A; Galbusera F; Raimondi MT; Sassi M; Fornari M
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 16563847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.
Ivanov AA; Kiapour A; Ebraheim NA; Goel V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E162-9. PubMed ID: 19247155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5: anatomic and finite element investigations.
Ivanov AA; Faizan A; Ebraheim NA; Yeasting R; Goel VK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2462-6. PubMed ID: 18090086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effect of posterior elements and ligamentous tissues of lumbar spine on load sharing.
Najarian S; Dargahi J; Heidari B
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 15911996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.
Quigley KJ; Alander DH; Bledsoe JG
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 18679101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
