These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16651840)
1. Comparative evaluation of BacT/ALERT 3D and BACTEC systems for the recovery of pathogens causing bloodstream infections. Jamal W; Tamaray G; Pazhoor A; Rotimi VO Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16651840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics. Flayhart D; Borek AP; Wakefield T; Dick J; Carroll KC J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):816-21. PubMed ID: 17166960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the BacT/Alert PF pediatric FAN blood culture bottle with the standard pediatric blood culture bottle, the Pedi-BacT. Krisher KK; Gibb P; Corbett S; Church D J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 39(8):2880-3. PubMed ID: 11474007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates. Dunne WM; Case LK; Isgriggs L; Lublin DM Transfusion; 2005 Jul; 45(7):1138-42. PubMed ID: 15987359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood. Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study to determine the recovery rate of microorganisms of bloodstream infections: two versus three blood culture specimens. Shanthachol T; Nilgate S; Suankratay C J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95(8):1053-8. PubMed ID: 23061310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of BACTEC and BacT/ALERT systems in evaluation of blood cultures]. Ardiç N; Ilga U; Ozyurt M; Haznedaroğlu T Mikrobiyol Bul; 2004 Oct; 38(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 15700666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing blood culture practices in pediatric immunocompromised patients: evaluation of media types and blood culture volume. Gaur A; Giannini MA; Flynn PM; Boudreaux JW; Mestemacher MA; Shenep JL; Hayden RT Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2003 Jun; 22(6):545-52. PubMed ID: 12799512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. Ziegler R; Johnscher I; Martus P; Lenhardt D; Just HM J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Mar; 36(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 9508291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. Wilson ML; Weinstein MP; Reimer LG; Mirrett S; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 1537900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients. Roh KH; Kim JY; Kim HN; Lee HJ; Sohn JW; Kim MJ; Cho Y; Kim YK; Lee CK Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jul; 73(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 22541787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/ALERT FN and the standard anaerobic SN blood culture medium. Mirrett S; Petti CA; Woods CW; Magadia R; Weinstein MP; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4581-5. PubMed ID: 15472312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of overnight storage of blood culture bottles on bacterial detection time in the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system. Janapatla RP; Yan JJ; Chien ML; Chen HM; Wu HM; Wu JJ J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Apr; 43(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20457429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Growth Performance of the BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and BACTEC FX Blood Culture Systems Under Simulated Bloodstream Infection Conditions. Park J; Han S; Shin S Clin Lab; 2017 Jan; 63(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 28164485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controlled comparison of original vented aerobic fan medium with new nonvented BacT/ALERT FA medium for culturing blood. Mirrett S; Everts RJ; Reller LB J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2098-101. PubMed ID: 11376041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the detection of anaerobic bacteria in haemoculture systems BACTEC Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F, BacT/Alert FAN Anaerobic and BacT/Alert FN Anaerobic]. Cermák P; Förstl M Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2005 Jun; 11(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 16025428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laboratory-based evaluation of significance to routinely use anaerobic blood culture bottles: analysis of positivity and rapidity to detect positive cultures]. Tamayose MH; Yamane N; Kisanuki K; Kawai M; Nakasone I Rinsho Byori; 2009 Dec; 57(12):1145-50. PubMed ID: 20077812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How long does it take to "rule out" bacteremia in children with central venous catheters? Shah SS; Downes KJ; Elliott MR; Bell LM; McGowan KL; Metlay JP Pediatrics; 2008 Jan; 121(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 18166567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]