179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16669297)
21. Measuring tissue interface pressures of two support surfaces used in the operating room.
Blaylock B; Gardner C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Mar; 40(2):42-4, 46, 48. PubMed ID: 8043178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determining the optimal inner air cell pressure for the effective reduction of interface pressure.
Sasaki N; Nakagami G; Sakai K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Nanjo Y; Sanada H
J Tissue Viability; 2012 May; 21(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 22542135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects.
Chai CY; Bader DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():427-35. PubMed ID: 23791952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors affecting the pressure-distributing properties of foam mattress overlays.
Krouskop TA; Noble PS; Brown J; Marburger R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jul; 23(3):33-9. PubMed ID: 3772816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting the cut-off point for interface pressure in pressure injury according to the standard hospital mattress and polyurethane foam mattress as support surfaces.
Yu M; Park KH; Shin J; Lee JH
Int Wound J; 2022 Oct; 19(6):1509-1517. PubMed ID: 35107216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design.
Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
Br J Clin Pract; 1993; 47(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 8260338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pressure distribution analysis of X-Ray table mattresses.
Alresheedi N; Walton LA; Tootell A; Webb JA; Hogg P
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Mar; 52(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 33339756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of a new clinical mattress solution on interface pressure and comfort during supine lying.
Webb JA; Chohan A
J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(8):513-518. PubMed ID: 37572343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measuring Pressure Redistribution Properties of 4 Hospital Bed Surfaces: A Quality Improvement Project.
Teleten O; Polyak TS; Espinoza J; Li AI; Rodgers AJ; Kirkland-Kyhn H
Wound Manag Prev; 2022 Jun; 68(6):18-26. PubMed ID: 35895032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Efficacy of a Viscoelastic Foam Overlay on Prevention of Pressure Injury in Acutely Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Park KH; Park J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):440-444. PubMed ID: 28877109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization.
Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Introducing the pressure support surfaces from Kaymed.
Pritchard B
Br J Nurs; 2001 Nov 22-Dec 12; 10(21):1427-8, 1430-1. PubMed ID: 11865249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective, in vivo evaluation of two pressure-redistribution surfaces in healthy volunteers using pressure mapping as a quality control instrument .
Miller S; Parker M; Blasiole N; Beinlich N; Fulton J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 23388397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Pentaflex pressure-reducing mattress replacement.
Fox C; Burgess-Allen N
Br J Nurs; 1999 Jul 22-Aug 11; 8(14):953-5. PubMed ID: 10711020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of absorbent incontinence pads on pressure management mattresses.
Fader M; Bain D; Cottenden A
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Dec; 48(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15548247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: A randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard.
Hemmes B; Brink PR; Poeze M
Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 24998039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
