These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16669297)

  • 41. Supine interface pressure in children.
    Solis I; Krouskop T; Trainer N; Marburger R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Jul; 69(7):524-6. PubMed ID: 3389994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of contact pressures measured at the sacrum of young and elderly subjects.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    J Biomed Eng; 1989 May; 11(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 2724940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of interface pressures measured at the sacrum while resting upon two types of foam mattresses and between platilon and plastic mattress covers.
    Clark M; Andrews J
    Age Ageing; 1991 Jul; 20(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 1927733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A randomized controlled trial to compare the interface pressures of alternating pressure overlay with gel pad versus gel pad alone during prolonged surgery.
    Neo TG; Koo SH; Chew STH; Png GK; Lacuesta MJ; Wu MYL; Tay RYC; Singh PA; Chandran R
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 May; 30(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 33612359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
    Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sacral skin blood flow response to alternating pressure operating room overlay.
    Karg P; Ranganathan VK; Churilla M; Brienza D
    J Tissue Viability; 2019 May; 28(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 30948241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Preventing pressure sores: matching patient and mattress using interface pressure measurements.
    Clark M; Rowland LB
    Decubitus; 1989 Feb; 2(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 2751833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of interface pressures in the pediatric population among various support surfaces.
    McLane KM; Krouskop TA; McCord S; Fraley JK
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2002 Sep; 29(5):242-51. PubMed ID: 12510470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Oxy-Mat™ Mattress System Development Utilizing Simultaneous Measurement of Interface Pressure and Deep Tissue Oxygen Saturation.
    Butler GJ; Kenyon DJ; Gorenstein S; Davenport T; Golembe E; Lee B; Vieweg J
    Surg Technol Int; 2015 May; 26():71-82. PubMed ID: 26054994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Modular Propad and the Softform mattress.
    Lowthian P
    Br J Nurs; 1996 May 9-22; 5(9):575-6, 578-80. PubMed ID: 8716483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interface pressure, wound healing, and satisfaction in the evaluation of a non-powered fluid mattress.
    Wells JA; Karr D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Feb; 44(2):38-42, 44-6, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 9526420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of mattresses using interface pressure mapping.
    Bain D; Ferguson-Pell M; McLeod A
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jun; 12(6):231-5. PubMed ID: 12838601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients.
    Keller BP; Lubbert PH; Keller E; Leenen LP
    Injury; 2005 Aug; 36(8):946-8. PubMed ID: 16023909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
    Tissue Viability Society
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forensic analysis of crib mattress properties on pediatric CPR quality--can we balance pressure reduction with CPR effectiveness?
    Niles DE; Maltese MR; Nishisaki A; Seacrist T; Leffelman J; Hutchins L; Schneck N; Sutton RM; Arbogast KB; Berg RA; Nadkarni VM
    Resuscitation; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23395793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
    Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reducing pressure ulcer incidence in a long-term setting.
    Hampton S; Collins F
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Aug 11-Sep 7; 14(15):S6-12. PubMed ID: 16144070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does a foamy-block mattress system prevent pressure sores ? A prospective randomised clinical trial in 1729 patients.
    Berthe JV; Bustillo A; Mélot C; de Fontaine S
    Acta Chir Belg; 2007; 107(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 17515264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
    Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
    Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.