These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16669388)

  • 1. Head replacement, head rotation, and surface damage effects on metal-on-metal total hip replacements: a hip simulator study.
    Hardaker C; Dowson D; Isaac GH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 16669388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal-on-metal hip simulator study of increased wear particle surface area due to 'severe' patient activity.
    Bowsher JG; Hussain A; Williams PA; Shelton JC
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 16669394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: effects of implant design and implantation time.
    Catelas I; Campbell PA; Bobyn JD; Medley JB; Huk OL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 16669387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation on stick phenomena in metal-on-metal hip joints after resting periods.
    Wimmer MA; Nassutt R; Sprecher C; Loos J; Täger G; Fischer A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 16669389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of head size on wear properties of metal-on-metal bearings of hip prostheses, and comparison with wear properties of metal-on-polyethylene bearings using hip simulator.
    Okazaki Y
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Mar; 31():152-63. PubMed ID: 24290355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the role of corrosion in the degradation of metal-on-metal implants.
    Yan Y; Neville A; Dowson D
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16669385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of microstructure on the wear of cobalt-based alloys used in metal-on-metal hip implants.
    Varano R; Bobyn JD; Medley JB; Yue S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 16669383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tribological principles in metal-on-metal hip joint design.
    Dowson D
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16669384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'Severe' wear challenge to 'as-cast' and 'double heat-treated' large-diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings.
    Bowsher JG; Nevelos J; Williams PA; Shelton JC
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 16669382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of 'running-in' on the tribology and surface morphology of metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing device in simulator studies.
    Vassiliou K; Elfick AP; Scholes SC; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 16669393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of wear of bearing surfaces on elastohydrodynamic lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants.
    Liu F; Jin ZM; Hirt F; Rieker C; Roberts P; Grigoris P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Sep; 219(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 16225148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metal-on-metal hip joint tribology.
    Dowson D; Jin ZM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 16669380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements.
    Goldsmith AA; Dowson D; Isaac GH; Lancaster JG
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 10718049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tribological and surface analysis of 38 mm alumina-as-cast Co-Cr-Mo total hip arthroplasties.
    Williams SR; Wu JJ; Unsworth A; Khan I
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Nov; 223(8):941-54. PubMed ID: 20092092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal hip prostheses under adverse conditions.
    Williams S; Al-Hajjar M; Isaac GH; Fisher J
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Jul; 101(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 23359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro study of the reduction in wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses using surface-engineered femoral heads.
    Fisher J; Hu XQ; Tipper JL; Stewart TD; Williams S; Stone MH; Davies C; Hatto P; Bolton J; Riley M; Hardaker C; Isaac GH; Berry G; Ingham E
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12206518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The wear of metal-on-metal total hip prostheses measured in a hip simulator.
    Scholes SC; Green SM; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 11848384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tribological behavior of artificial hip joint under the effects of magnetic field in dry and lubricated sliding.
    Zaki M; Aljinaidi A; Hamed M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12883170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear and deformation of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacements with joint laxity and swing phase microseparation.
    Williams S; Butterfield M; Stewart T; Ingham E; Stone M; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12666782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements.
    Smith SL; Dowson D; Goldsmith AA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 11382075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.