These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Case reopens abortion issue for justices. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The next abortion decision. N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors. Scuder AC Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: Supreme Court avoids disturbing abortion precedents by ruling on grounds of Remedy-Ayotte v. planned parenthood of Northern New England. Law N J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 16789971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Privacy issues for girls are in the news and in BJN. Foss TD Br J Nurs; 2006 Jan 26-Feb 8; 15(2):65. PubMed ID: 16493277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion in America. Shostak AB Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whither the family and family privacy? Jones TR; Peterman L Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer. New Jersey. Supreme Court Wests Atl Report; 2000; 762():620-47. PubMed ID: 16477733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy. Storrow RF; Martinez S Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]