These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16670473)

  • 1. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children.
    Huynh SC; Mai TQ; Kifley A; Wang JJ; Rose KA; Mitchell P
    Cornea; 2006 May; 25(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 16670473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of instrument rotation on handheld keratometry.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2590-4. PubMed ID: 15617929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of keratometric values and corneal eccentricity of myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2011; 67(5-6):181-6. PubMed ID: 22448420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.
    Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer.
    Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 153(1):55-61.e2. PubMed ID: 21907967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, and axis location in normal eyes obtained from an autokeratometer and a corneal topographer.
    Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Ishii R; Sato N; Wang G; Shimizu K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):648-54. PubMed ID: 22342010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Corneal Keratometric and Astigmatism Measurements Using Verion System and Other Instruments in Cataract Patient.
    Fu Y; Yu X; Savini G; Huang J; Lian H; Song B; Wang Q; Zhao Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Oct; 43(10):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 29890084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of posture and artificial tears on corneal power measurements with a handheld automated keratometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 15050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of soft contact lenses on optical measurements of axial length and keratometry for biometry in eyes with corneal irregularities.
    Lewis JR; Knellinger AE; Mahmoud AM; Mauger TF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3371-8. PubMed ID: 18441314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.
    Lauschke JL; Lawless M; Sutton G; Roberts TV; Hodge C
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 44(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27381574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of keratometric readings as obtained by Javal Ophthalmometer and Corneal Analysis System (EyeSys).
    Tsilimbaris MK; Vlachonikolis IG; Siganos D; Makridakis G; Pallikaris IG
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 1958623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Jain R; Dilraj G; Grewal SP
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2007; 55(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 17699942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements.
    Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of corneal curvature on central and paracentral pachymetry with optical coherence tomography.
    Wirbelauer C; Thannhäuser CL; Pham DT
    Cornea; 2009 Apr; 28(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19387224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-meridional keratometry.
    Rosenfield M; Portello JK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Jan; 16(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 8729571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability data and agreement of keratometry with the VERION system compared to the IOLMaster.
    Nemeth G; Szalai E; Hassan Z; Lipecz A; Berta A; Modis L
    J Refract Surg; 2015 May; 31(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 25974973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a handheld automated keratometer in adults.
    Noonan CP; Rao GP; Kaye SB; Green JR; Chandna A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 9559480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of preoperative keratometry on refractive results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
    de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Sánchez-Pina JM; Gil-Cazorla R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):968-73. PubMed ID: 18499003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.