495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16671067)
1. Ecotoxicity testing of chemicals with particular reference to pesticides.
Walker CH
Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Jul; 62(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 16671067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
Box RJ; Spielmann H
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment.
Breitholtz M; Rudén C; Hansson SO; Bengtsson BE
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 Feb; 63(2):324-35. PubMed ID: 16406525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecotoxicity testing: science, politics and ethics.
Walker CH
Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 18333718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management.
Moore MN; Depledge MH; Readman JW; Paul Leonard DR
Mutat Res; 2004 Aug; 552(1-2):247-68. PubMed ID: 15288556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatially explicit method for ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticides for birds.
Sala S; Cavalli M; Vighi M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Mar; 73(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 20074804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: implications for human health risk assessment.
Krewski D; Andersen ME; Mantus E; Zeise L
Risk Anal; 2009 Apr; 29(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 19144067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The copepod Tigriopus: a promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics.
Raisuddin S; Kwok KW; Leung KM; Schlenk D; Lee JS
Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 83(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 17560667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher-tier laboratory methods for assessing the aquatic toxicity of pesticides.
Boxall AB; Brown CD; Barrett KL
Pest Manag Sci; 2002 Jul; 58(7):637-48. PubMed ID: 12146164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation?
Henegar A; Mombelli E; Pandard P; Péry AR
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 21093016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter to the editor: a regulatory view on the discussion on the role of alternative methods in the risk assessment of chemicals in the context of REACH.
Gundert-Remy U; Bernauer U; Madle S; Oberemm A; Schulte A; Richter-Reichhelm HB
Arch Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 83(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19002668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments.
Arts JH; Muijser H; Jonker D; van de Sandt JJ; Bos PM; Feron VJ
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 18455380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Studying toxicants as single chemicals: does this strategy adequately identify neurotoxic risk?
Cory-Slechta DA
Neurotoxicology; 2005 Aug; 26(4):491-510. PubMed ID: 16112317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modular one-generation reproduction study as a flexible testing system for regulatory safety assessment.
Vogel R; Seidle T; Spielmann H
Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 19808091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meeting the common needs of a more effective and efficient testing and assessment paradigm for chemical risk management.
Dellarco V; Henry T; Sayre P; Seed J; Bradbury S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):347-60. PubMed ID: 20574907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility.
Dent MP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
