133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16672061)
1. Electrical impedance tomography system: an open access circuit design.
Soleimani M
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():28. PubMed ID: 16672061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Boverman G; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Amm BC; Wang X; Davenport DM; Chong DH; Sahni R; Ashe JM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 27295649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological impedance cross evaluation and imaging from composite measurements of magnetic and electrical methods.
Ran P; Xiao X; He W; Li Z
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1695-702. PubMed ID: 26405936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S43-50. PubMed ID: 16636419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration.
Romsauerova A; McEwan A; Horesh L; Yerworth R; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S147-61. PubMed ID: 16636407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing boundary effects in static EIT imaging.
Kao TJ; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S13-23. PubMed ID: 16636405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography).
Bayford RH
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2006; 8():63-91. PubMed ID: 16834552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The complete electrode model for imaging and electrode contact compensation in electrical impedance tomography.
Boverman G; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3462-5. PubMed ID: 18002742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3D reconstruction algorithm for EIT using a handheld probe for breast cancer detection.
Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S1-11. PubMed ID: 16636401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: computer simulation study.
Seo JK; Pyo HC; Park C; Kwon O; Woo EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4371-82. PubMed ID: 15509071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
