BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16672296)

  • 1. Combined auditory and visual stimuli facilitate head saccades in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Whitchurch EA; Takahashi TT
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 96(2):730-45. PubMed ID: 16672296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crossmodal integration in the primate superior colliculus underlying the preparation and initiation of saccadic eye movements.
    Bell AH; Meredith MA; Van Opstal AJ; Munoz DP
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3659-73. PubMed ID: 15703222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound localization by barn owls in a simulated echoic environment.
    Spitzer MW; Takahashi TT
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3571-84. PubMed ID: 16709722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-flight corrections in free-flying barn owls (Tyto alba) during sound localization tasks.
    Hausmann L; Plachta DT; Singheiser M; Brill S; Wagner H
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Sep; 211(Pt 18):2976-88. PubMed ID: 18775935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How barn owls (Tyto alba) visually follow moving voles (Microtus socialis) before attacking them.
    Fux M; Eilam D
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Sep; 98(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 19577583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multisensory enhancement in the optic tectum of the barn owl: spike count and spike timing.
    Zahar Y; Reches A; Gutfreund Y
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2380-94. PubMed ID: 19261710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The eccentricity effect for auditory saccadic reaction times is independent of target frequency.
    Gabriel DN; Munoz DP; Boehnke SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 262(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 20138978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in a complex scene.
    Corneil BD; Van Wanrooij M; Munoz DP; Van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jul; 88(1):438-54. PubMed ID: 12091566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.
    Colonius H; Diederich A; Steenken R
    Brain Topogr; 2009 May; 21(3-4):177-84. PubMed ID: 19337824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaze orienting in dynamic visual double steps.
    Vliegen J; Van Grootel TJ; Van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4300-13. PubMed ID: 16107519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.
    Steenken R; Colonius H; Diederich A; Rach S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():150-6. PubMed ID: 17900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.
    Engelken EJ; Stevens KW; Enderle JD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Apr; 62(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 2031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The latency of saccades toward auditory targets in humans.
    Zambarbieri D
    Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():51-9. PubMed ID: 12508581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation in the auditory space map of the barn owl.
    Gutfreund Y; Knudsen EI
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 96(2):813-25. PubMed ID: 16707713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interstimulus contingency facilitates saccadic responses in a bimodal go/no-go task.
    Kirchner H; Colonius H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):261-72. PubMed ID: 16040236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perisaccadic mislocalization of visual targets by head-free gaze shifts: visual or motor?
    van Wetter SM; van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 100(4):1848-67. PubMed ID: 18436630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound-localization performance in the cat: the effect of restraining the head.
    Tollin DJ; Populin LC; Moore JM; Ruhland JL; Yin TC
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 93(3):1223-34. PubMed ID: 15483065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The adaptation of visual and auditory integration in the barn owl superior colliculus with Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity.
    Huo J; Murray A
    Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):913-21. PubMed ID: 19084371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.