434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16672970)
1. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Climatic and temporal effects on the expression of secondary sexual characters: genetic and environmental components.
Garant D; Sheldon BC; Gustafsson L
Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):634-44. PubMed ID: 15119446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolutionary genetics: evolution of mate choice in the wild.
Postma E; Griffith SC; Brooks R
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):E16; discussion E16-7. PubMed ID: 17167425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds.
Robinson MR; van Doorn GS; Gustafsson L; Qvarnström A
Ecol Lett; 2012 Jun; 15(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 22487545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort.
Qvarnström A; Pärt T; Sheldon BC
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6784):344-7. PubMed ID: 10830962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality.
van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 15278842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers.
Veen T; Borge T; Griffith SC; Saetre GP; Bures S; Gustafsson L; Sheldon BC
Nature; 2001 May; 411(6833):45-50. PubMed ID: 11333971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes.
Jensen H; Steinsland I; Ringsby TH; Saether BE
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1275-93. PubMed ID: 18384654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the genetics of aging in a wild passerine bird.
Brommer JE; Wilson AJ; Gustafsson L
Am Nat; 2007 Oct; 170(4):643-50. PubMed ID: 17891742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
Chaine AS; Lyon BE
Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
Servedio MR; Lande R
Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
Reichard M; Bryja J; Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Kaniewska P; Smith C
Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population.
Merilä J; Kruuk LE; Sheldon BC
Nature; 2001 Jul; 412(6842):76-9. PubMed ID: 11452309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cryptic sex-ratio bias provides indirect genetic benefits despite sexual conflict.
Cox RM; Calsbeek R
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5974):92-4. PubMed ID: 20203012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No evidence of an MHC-based female mating preference in great reed warblers.
Westerdahl H
Mol Ecol; 2004 Aug; 13(8):2465-70. PubMed ID: 15245418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
