243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16673687)
1. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary abnormalities in postcholecystectomy patients: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies.
Howard K; Lord SJ; Speer A; Gibson RN; Padbury R; Kearney B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 16673687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Meagher S; Yusoff I; Kennedy W; Martel M; Adam V; Barkun A
Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.
Morris S; Gurusamy KS; Sheringham J; Davidson BR
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121699. PubMed ID: 25799113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.
Epelboym I; Winner M; Allendorf JD
J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 May; 17(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 23515912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison Costs of ERCP and MRCP in Patients with Suspected Biliary Obstruction Based on a Randomized Trial.
Adam V; Bhat M; Martel M; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Barkun JS; Barkun AN
Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 26409603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.
Romagnuolo J; Currie G;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomised clinical trial: MRCP-first vs. ERCP-first approach in patients with suspected biliary obstruction due to bile duct stones.
Bhat M; Romagnuolo J; da Silveira E; Reinhold C; Valois E; Martel M; Barkun JS; Barkun AN
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2013 Nov; 38(9):1045-53. PubMed ID: 24024705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic evaluation of MR cholangiopancreatography compared to diagnostic ERCP for the investigation of biliary tree obstruction.
Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Kaltenthaler E; Walters S; Blakeborough A; Thomas S
Int J Surg; 2006; 4(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17462309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
