These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16673847)

  • 1. The dynamics and validity of the group selection interview.
    Tran T; Blackman MC
    J Soc Psychol; 2006 Apr; 146(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 16673847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residency selection: should interviewers be given applicants' board scores?
    Smilen SW; Funai EF; Bianco AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):508-13. PubMed ID: 11228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.
    Wilhelmy A; Kleinmann M; Melchers KG; Götz M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():740. PubMed ID: 28611696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.
    Uijtdehaage S; Doyle L; Parker N
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1032-9. PubMed ID: 21694560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A formal reception improves orthopaedic surgery residency program applicant perceptions of the interview experience.
    Lantry JM; Nyland JA; Perkins DR; Roberts CS
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 106(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 18478847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
    Bye HH; Sandal GM
    J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match.
    Little DC; Yoder SM; Grikscheit TC; Jackson CC; Fuchs JR; McCrudden KW; Holcomb GW
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Jan; 40(1):69-73; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 15868561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors used by pediatric emergency medicine program directors to select their fellows.
    Poirier MP; Pruitt CW
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2003 Jun; 19(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12813299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination against facially stigmatized applicants in interviews: an eye-tracking and face-to-face investigation.
    Madera JM; Hebl MR
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 22004221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Methodology of a study on insomnia in the general population].
    Ohayon MM
    Encephale; 2002; 28(3 Pt 1):217-26. PubMed ID: 12091782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of personality type on decision making in the physical therapy admission process.
    Bezner JR; Boucher BK
    J Allied Health; 2001; 30(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11398234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role and nature of an interview in the selection of CUP applicants.
    Novascone MA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1987 Oct; 87(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 3655167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Fam Med; 2008; 40(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 18979262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptance of structured diagnostic interviews for mental disorders in clinical practice and research settings.
    Suppiger A; In-Albon T; Hendriksen S; Hermann E; Margraf J; Schneider S
    Behav Ther; 2009 Sep; 40(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 19647528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system.
    Bell BS; Wiechmann D; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 16551196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychological evaluation of Japanese astronaut applicants.
    Sekiguchi C; Umikura S; Sone K; Kume M
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Oct; 65(10 Pt 1):920-4. PubMed ID: 7832734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple mini-interviews: opinions of candidates and interviewers.
    Humphrey S; Dowson S; Wall D; Diwakar V; Goodyear HM
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 18230094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting who will choose a family medicine residency.
    Nasmith L; Rubenstein H; Goldstein H; Sproule D; Franco ED; Tellier P
    Acad Med; 1997 Oct; 72(10):908-12. PubMed ID: 9347714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.