234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16673856)
1. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
Schmidt U; Temerinac D; Bildstein K; Tuschy B; Mayer J; Sütterlin M; Siemer J; Kehl S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. A comparison by race and sex.
Davis RO; Cutter GR; Goldenberg RL; Hoffman HJ; Cliver SP; Brumfield CG
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8487238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of birthweight by fetal ultrasound biometry.
Nzeh DA; Rimmer S; Moore WM; Hunt L
Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):987-9. PubMed ID: 1450836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasonic measurements of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness in the estimation of fetal weight].
Han Y; Lin H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 May; 33(5):277-9. PubMed ID: 10682438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements.
Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; Bors-Koefoed R; Nochimson DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 3618691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
Smulian JC; Ranzini AC; Ananth CV; Rosenberg JC; Vintzileos AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
