222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16674113)
21. Performance of isobaric and isotopic labeling in quantitative plant proteomics.
Nogueira FC; Palmisano G; Schwämmle V; Campos FA; Larsen MR; Domont GB; Roepstorff P
J Proteome Res; 2012 May; 11(5):3046-52. PubMed ID: 22452248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Virtual expert mass spectrometrist: iTRAQ tool for database-dependent search, quantitation and result storage.
Rodríguez-Suárez E; Gubb E; Alzueta IF; Falcón-Pérez JM; Amorim A; Elortza F; Matthiesen R
Proteomics; 2010 Apr; 10(8):1545-56. PubMed ID: 20140907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An overview of label-free quantitation methods in proteomics by mass spectrometry.
Wong JW; Cagney G
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():273-83. PubMed ID: 20013377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High precision quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometric method combining the benefits of all.
Köcher T; Pichler P; Schutzbier M; Stingl C; Kaul A; Teucher N; Hasenfuss G; Penninger JM; Mechtler K
J Proteome Res; 2009 Oct; 8(10):4743-52. PubMed ID: 19663507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of an integrated approach for evaluation of 2-D gel image analysis: impact of multiple proteins in single spots on comparative proteomics in conventional 2-D gel/MALDI workflow.
Yang Y; Thannhauser TW; Li L; Zhang S
Electrophoresis; 2007 Jun; 28(12):2080-94. PubMed ID: 17486657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative evaluation of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Chen Z; Wang Q; Lin L; Tang Q; Edwards JL; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2908-15. PubMed ID: 22404494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relative quantification of proteins across the species boundary through the use of shared peptides.
Snijders AP; de Koning B; Wright PC
J Proteome Res; 2007 Jan; 6(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 17203953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. SuperHirn - a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling.
Mueller LN; Rinner O; Schmidt A; Letarte S; Bodenmiller B; Brusniak MY; Vitek O; Aebersold R; Müller M
Proteomics; 2007 Oct; 7(19):3470-80. PubMed ID: 17726677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing biological variation and protein processing in primary human leukocytes by automated multiplex stable isotope labeling coupled to 2 dimensional peptide separation.
Raijmakers R; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
Mol Biosyst; 2009 Sep; 5(9):992-1003. PubMed ID: 19668865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of two tandem mass spectrometry-based methods for analyzing the proteome of healthy human lens fibers.
Zhang C; Liu P; Wang N; Li Y; Wang L
Mol Vis; 2007 Oct; 13():1873-7. PubMed ID: 17960125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of proteome similarity for the qualitative and quantitative profiling of reperfused myocardium.
Vissers JP; Pons S; Hulin A; Tissier R; Berdeaux A; Connolly JB; Langridge JI; Geromanos SJ; Ghaleh B
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2009 May; 877(13):1317-26. PubMed ID: 18996061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimating influence of cofragmentation on peptide quantification and identification in iTRAQ experiments by simulating multiplexed spectra.
Li H; Hwang KB; Mun DG; Kim H; Lee H; Lee SW; Paek E
J Proteome Res; 2014 Jul; 13(7):3488-97. PubMed ID: 24918111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sequence similarity-driven proteomics in organisms with unknown genomes by LC-MS/MS and automated de novo sequencing.
Waridel P; Frank A; Thomas H; Surendranath V; Sunyaev S; Pevzner P; Shevchenko A
Proteomics; 2007 Jul; 7(14):2318-29. PubMed ID: 17623296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments.
Wong JW; Sullivan MJ; Cagney G
Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar; 9(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 17905794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An iterative strategy for precursor ion selection for LC-MS/MS based shotgun proteomics.
Zerck A; Nordhoff E; Resemann A; Mirgorodskaya E; Suckau D; Reinert K; Lehrach H; Gobom J
J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3239-51. PubMed ID: 19402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics.
Chen X; Sun L; Yu Y; Xue Y; Yang P
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 4(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17288513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative proteome analysis using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents coupled with 2D LC/MS/MS in 3T3-L1 adipocytes following hypoxia or normoxia.
Choi S; Cho K; Kim J; Yea K; Park G; Lee J; Ryu SH; Kim J; Kim YH
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2009 May; 383(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 19336224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Visual analysis of gel-free proteome data.
Linsen L; Löcherbach J; Berth M; Becher D; Bernhardt J
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 16805259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Application of iTRAQ multiple labeling and tandem mass spectrometry in proteomic research of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells].
Wang L; Dai Y; Tu Z; Zhang Y; Qi S
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 28(3):538-42. PubMed ID: 21774219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Novel approach for peptide quantitation and sequencing based on 15N and 13C metabolic labeling.
Snijders AP; de Vos MG; Wright PC
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(2):578-85. PubMed ID: 15822937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
