BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16674583)

  • 1. Asymmetric gene flow and constraints on adaptation caused by sex ratio distorters.
    Telschow A; Engelstädter J; Yamamura N; Hammerstein P; Hurst GD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 16674583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coexistence of cytoplasmic incompatibility and male-killing-inducing endosymbionts, and their impact on host gene flow.
    Engelstädter J; Telschow A; Yamamura N
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Feb; 73(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 17915272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Migration-selection balance and local adaptation of mitochondrial haplotypes in rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis) along an elevational gradient.
    Cheviron ZA; Brumfield RT
    Evolution; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1593-605. PubMed ID: 19187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene-culture coevolution and sex ratios: II. Sex-chromosomal distorters and cultural preferences for offspring sex.
    Kumm J; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Aug; 52(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 9345791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene-culture coevolution and sex ratios: the effects of infanticide, sex-selective abortion, sex selection, and sex-biased parental investment on the evolution of sex ratios.
    Kumm J; Laland KN; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1994 Dec; 46(3):249-78. PubMed ID: 7846643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene-Culture Coevolution and Sex Ratios: II. Sex-Chromosomal Distorters and Cultural Preferences for Offspring Sex.
    Kumm J; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Aug; 7(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 9356319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting adaptation under migration load: the role of genetic skew.
    Yeaman S; Guillaume F
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19619220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative estimation of effective population sizes and temporal gene flow in two contrasting population systems.
    Fraser DJ; Hansen MM; Ostergaard S; Tessier N; Legault M; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Sep; 16(18):3866-89. PubMed ID: 17850551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene flow, effective population size and selection at major histocompatibility complex genes: brown trout in the Hardanger Fjord, Norway.
    Hansen MM; Skaala O; Jensen LF; Bekkevold D; Mensberg KL
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Apr; 16(7):1413-25. PubMed ID: 17391266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multilocus perspective on colonization accompanied by selection and gene flow.
    Rosenblum EB; Hickerson MJ; Moritz C
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2971-85. PubMed ID: 17976180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host-parasitoid interaction.
    Forde SE; Thompson JN; Bohannan BJ
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7010):841-4. PubMed ID: 15483611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment.
    West SA; Sheldon BC
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1685-8. PubMed ID: 11823605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene flow maintains a large genetic difference in clutch size at a small spatial scale.
    Postma E; van Noordwijk AJ
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7021):65-8. PubMed ID: 15635410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex ratio selection and multi-factorial sex determination in the housefly: a dynamic model.
    Kozielska M; Pen I; Beukeboom LW; Weissing FJ
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):879-88. PubMed ID: 16674584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapidly shifting sex ratio across a species range.
    Hornett EA; Charlat S; Wedell N; Jiggins CD; Hurst GD
    Curr Biol; 2009 Oct; 19(19):1628-31. PubMed ID: 19747825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males?
    Kokko H; Gunnarsson TG; Morrell LJ; Gill JA
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1293-303. PubMed ID: 17032361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Host resistance does not explain variation in incidence of male-killing bacteria in Drosophila bifasciata.
    Veneti Z; Toda MJ; Hurst GD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():52. PubMed ID: 15571631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex ratio evolution under probabilistic sex determination.
    Paixão T; Phadke SS; Azevedo RB; Zufall RA
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2050-60. PubMed ID: 21729059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.
    Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of male-killing bacteria on host evolutionary processes.
    Engelstädter J; Hurst GD
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 17151259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.