367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16674615)
1. Protein cross-contamination during batch cleaning and autoclaving of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Richards E; Brimacombe J; Laupau W; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):431-3. PubMed ID: 16674615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High concentration potassium permanganate eliminates protein and particle contamination of the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Laupu W; Brimacombe J; Richards E; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2006 Jun; 61(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 16704584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protein contamination of the Laryngeal Mask Airway and its relationship to re-use.
Greenwood J; Green N; Power G
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Jun; 34(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 16802488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eliminating protein from reusable laryngeal mask airways. A study comparing routinely cleaned masks with three alternative cleaning methods.
Coetzee GJ
Anaesthesia; 2003 Apr; 58(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 12648116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Presence of protein deposits on 'cleaned' re-usable anaesthetic equipment.
Miller DM; Youkhana I; Karunaratne WU; Pearce A
Anaesthesia; 2001 Nov; 56(11):1069-72. PubMed ID: 11703239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residual protein contamination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airways after two washing protocols.
Stone T; Brimacombe J; Keller C; Kelley D; Clery G
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2004 Jun; 32(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 15264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from reusable laryngeal mask devices.
Clery G; Brimacombe J; Stone T; Keller C; Curtis S
Anesth Analg; 2003 Oct; 97(4):1189-1191. PubMed ID: 14500180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Disposable vs reusable laryngeal mask airway: a cost-minimization analysis].
Soulias M; Martin L; Garnier N; Juniot A; Aho LS; Freysz M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Aug; 25(8):811-4. PubMed ID: 16603333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potassium permanganate reduces protein contamination of reusable laryngeal mask airways.
Laupu W; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 2004 Aug; 99(2):614-6, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15271751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supplementary cleaning does not remove protein deposits from re-usable laryngeal mask devices.
Brimacombe J; Stone T; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 2004 Mar; 51(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 15010409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of high concentration potassium permanganate on protein contamination from metallic and synthetic rubber airway equipment.
Laupu W; Brimacombe J
Anaesthesia; 2007 Aug; 62(8):824-6. PubMed ID: 17635432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The classic laryngeal mask airway: a tried and tested airway. What now?
Cook TM
Br J Anaesth; 2006 Feb; 96(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16415319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the risk of prion transmission in anaesthesia.
Walsh EM
Anaesthesia; 2006 Jan; 61(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 16409346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The anatomical position of three extraglottic airway devices in patients with clear airways.
van Zundert A; Brimacombe J; Kamphuis R; Haanschoten M
Anaesthesia; 2006 Sep; 61(9):891-5. PubMed ID: 16922757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the disposable Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask with the reusable LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Sudhir G; Redfern D; Hall JE; Wilkes AR; Cann C
Anaesthesia; 2007 Jul; 62(7):719-22. PubMed ID: 17567349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from the classic laryngeal mask airway.
Bannon L; Brimacombe J; Nixon T; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2005 Jul; 22(7):515-7. PubMed ID: 16045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between visual analysis and microscope assessment of surgical instrument cleanliness from sterile service departments.
Lipscomb IP; Sihota AK; Keevil CW
J Hosp Infect; 2008 Jan; 68(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17942186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised comparison of the single use LMA Flexible with the reusable LMA Flexible in paediatric dental day-case patients.
Flynn P; Ahmed FB; Mitchell V; Patel A; Clarke S
Anaesthesia; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1281-4. PubMed ID: 17991266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
