108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16674989)
1. Fluorescence-based monitoring of tracer and substrate distribution in an UASB reactor.
Lou SJ; Tartakovsky B; Zeng Y; Wu P; Guiot SR
Chemosphere; 2006 Nov; 65(7):1212-20. PubMed ID: 16674989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of a mesophilic (37 degrees C) upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in treating distiller's grains wastewater.
Gao M; She Z; Jin C
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar; 141(3):808-13. PubMed ID: 16949738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of change in volatile fatty acid (VFA) composition on methanogenic upflow filter reactor (UFAF) performance.
Demirel B; Yenigün O
Environ Technol; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1179-87. PubMed ID: 12465844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring the restart-up of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of a soybean processing wastewater.
Dong F; Zhao QB; Zhao JB; Sheng GP; Tang Y; Tong ZH; Yu HQ; Li YY; Harada H
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar; 101(6):1722-6. PubMed ID: 19896839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic treatment of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.
Oktem YA; Ince O; Sallis P; Donnelly T; Ince BK
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(5):1089-96. PubMed ID: 17449241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stimulation of methanol degradation in UASB reactors: in situ versus pre-loading cobalt on anaerobic granular sludge.
Zandvoort MH; Gieteling J; Lettinga G; Lens PN
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 Sep; 87(7):897-904. PubMed ID: 15334416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the efficacy of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor in removal of colour and reduction of COD in real textile wastewater.
Somasiri W; Li XF; Ruan WQ; Jian C
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jun; 99(9):3692-9. PubMed ID: 17719776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP).
Sponza DT; Uluköy A
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 17254694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaerobic biodegradability and treatment of grey water in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Elmitwalli TA; Otterpohl R
Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(6):1379-87. PubMed ID: 17276482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental and modeling investigations of a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge-filter bed (UASFB) reactor.
Rajinikanth R; Ramirez I; Steyer JP; Mehrotra I; Kumar P; Escudie R; Torrijos M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18653944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-wavelength fluorometry for anaerobic digestion process monitoring.
Morel E; Santamaria K; Perrier M; Guiot SR; Tartakovsky B
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):465-71. PubMed ID: 16180465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the methanogenic step of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process of acidified olive mill solid residue from a previous hydrolytic-acidogenic step.
Rincón B; Borja R; Martín MA; Martín A
Waste Manag; 2009 Sep; 29(9):2566-73. PubMed ID: 19450962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships between anaerobic consortia and removal efficiencies in an UASB reactor degrading 2,4 dichlorophenol (DCP).
Sponza DT; Cigal C
J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 17379394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinetics of concentration decay of specific organic matter in UASB reactors operating with and without return of aerobic sludge.
Pontes PP; Chernicharo CA; Von Sperling M
Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):2046-54. PubMed ID: 24956799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of UASB reactor performance during start-up operation using synthetic mixed-acid waste.
Vadlani PV; Ramachandran KB
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(17):8231-6. PubMed ID: 18439822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of nickel deprivation on methanol degradation in a methanogenic granular sludge bioreactor.
Zandvoort MH; Osuna MB; Geerts R; Lettinga G; Lens PN
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 29(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 12407462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potentials of anaerobic treatment for catalytically oxidized olive mill wastewater (OMW).
El-Gohary F; Tawfik A; Badawy M; El-Khateeb MA
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(7):2147-54. PubMed ID: 19070481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate.
Kaparaju P; Serrano M; Angelidaki I
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6317-23. PubMed ID: 19647428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters.
Bhunia P; Ghangrekar MM
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4229-38. PubMed ID: 17936620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in UASB reactor under methanogenic conditions.
Majumder PS; Gupta SK
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4169-77. PubMed ID: 17928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
