These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Your own desktop crime lab. Powell K Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Focus on fraud. Where are they now? Basu P Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492-3. PubMed ID: 16675982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower. Malek J Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest. Cohen P New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research ethics. Global research integrity training. Steneck NH Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):552-3. PubMed ID: 23641099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema. Shaw D Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 29594670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]