These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16675983)

  • 1. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plagiarize or perish?
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can't hide your lying eyes.
    Wadman M
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Your own desktop crime lab.
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fraud in scientific publishing.
    Scully C; Baum B
    Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Focus on fraud. Where are they now?
    Basu P
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492-3. PubMed ID: 16675982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of culture in research misconduct.
    Davis MS
    Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collateral damage.
    Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7310):1023. PubMed ID: 20739963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mystery fraud accusations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7319):1020. PubMed ID: 20981065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower.
    Malek J
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research ethics. Planned misconduct surveys meet stiff resistance.
    Holden C
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5598):1549. PubMed ID: 12446890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research ethics. Global research integrity training.
    Steneck NH
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):552-3. PubMed ID: 23641099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.
    Shaw D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 29594670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.