These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16676338)
41. Challenges and strategies of dyad research: cardiovascular examples. Quinn C; Dunbar SB; Clark PC; Strickland OL Appl Nurs Res; 2010 May; 23(2):e15-20. PubMed ID: 20420989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Strategies for overcoming site and recruitment challenges in research studies based in intensive care units. Chlan L; Guttormson J; Tracy MF; Bremer KL Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 19723861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of a multifaceted educational program for care staff concerning fecal incontinence in nursing home patients: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Blekken LE; Vinsnes AG; Gjeilo KH; Mørkved S; Salvesen Ø; Norton C; Nakrem S Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():69. PubMed ID: 25887238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study. Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Implementing a Memory Clinic Model to Facilitate Recruitment into Early Phase Clinical Trials for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Park L; Kouhanim C; Lee S; Mendoza Z; Patrick K; Gertsik L; Aguilar C; Gullaba D; Semenova S; Jhee S J Prev Alzheimers Dis; 2019; 6(2):135-138. PubMed ID: 30756120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Consenting to research is more than a contractual agreement-it is a personal commitment. Hinds PS Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 19411934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Supplementary home biofeedback improves quality of life in younger patients with fecal incontinence. Bartlett L; Sloots K; Nowak M; Ho YH J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015; 49(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 25856243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. 'Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment' - the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials. Daykin A; Clement C; Gamble C; Kearney A; Blazeby J; Clarke M; Lane JA; Shaw A Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 29378618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Motivation and barriers to participation in clinical trials]. Gaul C; Schmidt T; Helm J; Hoyer H; Haerting J Med Klin (Munich); 2006 Nov; 101(11):873-9. PubMed ID: 17235473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cost-effectiveness of health research study participant recruitment strategies: a systematic review. Huynh L; Johns B; Liu SH; Vedula SS; Li T; Puhan MA Clin Trials; 2014 Oct; 11(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 24980278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent. Whitesides LW; Baren JM; Biros MH; Fleischman RJ; Govindarajan PR; Jones EB; Pancioli AM; Pentz RD; Scicluna VM; Wright DW; Dickert NW Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 28359192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The nurse clinician as research participant recruiter: experience from a longitudinal intervention study. Morrison-Beedy D; Aronowitz T; Dyne J; Mkandawire L; Murphy C; Martin J J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 2001; 32(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 16052902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Privacy for defecation and fecal incontinence in older adults. Akpan A; Gosney MA; Barrett J J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2006; 33(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 17133142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Recruitment to intellectual disability research: a qualitative study. Nicholson L; Colyer M; Cooper SA J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Jul; 57(7):647-56. PubMed ID: 22672134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Recruitment of Individuals With Dementia and Their Carers for Social Research: Lessons Learned From Nine Studies. Beattie E; Fielding E; O'Reilly M; Brooks D; MacAndrew M; McCrow J Res Gerontol Nurs; 2018 May; 11(3):119-128. PubMed ID: 29634849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The darker side of randomized trials: recruitment challenges. Sibai T; Carlisle H; Tornetta P J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():49-55. PubMed ID: 22810448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. An exploration of intent for narrative methods of inquiry. Hardy S; Gregory S; Ramjeet J Nurse Res; 2009; 16(4):7-19. PubMed ID: 19653542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The trials and tribulations of enrolling couples in a randomized, controlled trial: a self-management program for hyperlipidemia as a model. Voils CI; Yancy WS; Weinberger M; Bolton J; Coffman CJ; Jeffreys A; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jul; 84(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 20599337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Hellström I; Nolan M; Nordenfelt L; Lundh U Nurs Ethics; 2007 Sep; 14(5):608-19. PubMed ID: 17901172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]