234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1667692)
1. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical performance of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable sutures.
Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 153(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 6272438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures.
Craig PH; Williams JA; Davis KW; Magoun AD; Levy AJ; Bogdansky S; Jones JP
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jul; 141(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1154207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (Polydioxanone, Poliglecaprone 25, Glycomer 631).
Molea G; Schonauer F; Bifulco G; D'Angelo D
Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Mar; 53(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 10878837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Studies on perfecting Polish-made linen threads for surgical use].
Jarosz-Cichulska H
Polim Med; 1988; 18(1-2):3-49. PubMed ID: 3064051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [In vivo studies on the tensile strength loss of absorbable synthetic threads].
Thiede A; Lünstedt B; Sonntag HG
Chirurg; 1980 Dec; 51(12):768-73. PubMed ID: 6258873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Maxon and PDS--evaluation and physical and biologic properties of monofilament absorbable suture materials].
Knoop M; Lünstedt B; Thiede A
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 371(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 3114577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
Lünstedt B; Debus S
Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of five synthetic absorbable suture materials in intestinal anastomosis: experimental study in rats].
de Werra C; Rendano F; D'Armiento F; Somma P; Forestieri P
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 12744098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the physical parameters and handling properties of short-duration and middle-duration absorbable suture materials].
Thiede A; Stüwe W; Lünstedt B
Chirurg; 1985 Dec; 56(12):803-8. PubMed ID: 3002727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
Ross G; Pavlides C; Long F; Kusaba A; Perlman M; Matsumoto T
Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures.
Debus ES; Geiger D; Sailer M; Ederer J; Thiede A
Eur Surg Res; 1997; 29(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9013106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
