BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16678444)

  • 1. Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.
    Seth AK; Iversen JR; Edelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):465-76. PubMed ID: 16678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of alpha power event-related desynchronization in the discrimination of spontaneous deceptive responses.
    Kim S; Jung KH; Lee JH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22554580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
    Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation--initial experience.
    Mohamed FB; Faro SH; Gordon NJ; Platek SM; Ahmad H; Williams JM
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):679-88. PubMed ID: 16436822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kozel FA; Johnson KA; Mu Q; Grenesko EL; Laken SJ; George MS
    Biol Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 58(8):605-13. PubMed ID: 16185668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processes leading to deception: ERP spatiotemporal principal component analysis and source analysis.
    Sun SY; Mai X; Liu C; Liu JY; Luo YJ
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 21225491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The production and detection of deception in an interactive game.
    Sip KE; Lynge M; Wallentin M; McGregor WB; Frith CD; Roepstorff A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3619-26. PubMed ID: 20727906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ganis G; Rosenfeld JP; Meixner J; Kievit RA; Schendan HE
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):312-9. PubMed ID: 21111834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
    Dong G; Wu H
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.
    Feng YJ; Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3257-3269. PubMed ID: 35344258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
    Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting the recognition of natural scenes from single trial MEG recordings of brain activity.
    Rieger JW; Reichert C; Gegenfurtner KR; Noesselt T; Braun C; Heinze HJ; Kruse R; Hinrichs H
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1056-68. PubMed ID: 18620063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillatory activity and phase-amplitude coupling in the human medial frontal cortex during decision making.
    Cohen MX; Elger CE; Fell J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):390-402. PubMed ID: 18510444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
    Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-frequency coupling of brain oscillations indicates the success in visual motion discrimination.
    Händel B; Haarmeier T
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(3):1040-6. PubMed ID: 19150503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.