255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679114)
1. Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or =-10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or =-10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds.
Simpson E; Patel U
Clin Radiol; 2006 May; 61(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 16679114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pixel distribution analysis: can it be used to distinguish clear cell carcinomas from angiomyolipomas with minimal fat?
Catalano OA; Samir AE; Sahani DV; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2008 Jun; 247(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 18413886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Takeuchi M; Sasaguri K; Leng S; Froemming A; Kawashima A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1142-51. PubMed ID: 27015866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging.
Davenport MS; Neville AM; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Chaudhry HS; Leder RA
Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 21555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma.
Schieda N; Hodgdon T; El-Khodary M; Flood TA; McInnes MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1236-41. PubMed ID: 25415700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New radiologic classification of renal angiomyolipomas.
Song S; Park BK; Park JJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 27666625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SH; Kim SY
Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1258-69. PubMed ID: 24259298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma.
Patel U; Simpson E; Kingswood JC; Saggar-Malik AK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):665-73; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 16038693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT.
Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of size of region-of-interest on differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and renal cysts on multi-phase CT: preliminary findings.
Rosenkrantz AB; Matza BW; Portnoy E; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Wehrli NE
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 24239241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using specific region of interest on contrast-enhanced CT: a new combination of quantitative tools.
Wang X; Song G; Jiang H
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jul; 21(1):47. PubMed ID: 34225784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
