These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679118)

  • 61. Comparison of N-butyl cyanoacrylate and onyx for the embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times.
    Velat GJ; Reavey-Cantwell JF; Sistrom C; Smullen D; Fautheree GL; Whiting J; Lewis SB; Mericle RA; Firment CS; Hoh BL
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Jul; 63(1 Suppl 1):ONS73-8; discussion ONS78-80. PubMed ID: 18728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Radiation doses to patients and personnel involved in embolization of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations.
    Berthelsen B; Cederblad A
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Nov; 32(6):492-7. PubMed ID: 1742131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation.
    Giordano BD; Baumhauer JF; Morgan TL; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1970-6. PubMed ID: 18665022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Preliminary study of using imaging plates to map skin dose of patients in interventional radiology procedures.
    Ohuchi H; Satoh T; Eguchi Y; Mori K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 15985500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.
    Kim KP; Miller DL; Balter S; Kleinerman RA; Linet MS; Kwon D; Simon SL
    Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 18301095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Flat detectors and new aspects of radiation safety.
    Gurley JC
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 19573712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey.
    Vano E; Järvinen H; Kosunen A; Bly R; Malone J; Dowling A; Larkin A; Padovani R; Bosmans H; Dragusin O; Jaschke W; Torbica P; Back C; Schreiner A; Bokou C; Kottou S; Tsapaki V; Jankowski J; Papierz S; Domienik J; Werduch A; Nikodemova D; Salat D; Kepler K; Bor MD; Vassileva J; Borisova R; Pellet S; Corbett RH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):39-45. PubMed ID: 18287189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Capturing patient doses from fluoroscopically based diagnostic and interventional systems.
    Balter S
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 18849686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Sanchez RM; Martinez D; Ibor LL; Gil A; Serna-Candel C
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 22859286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Patients' skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Koyama Y; Yamamoto H; Ochiai M; Asakura Y; Ikari Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 17932885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reassessment of radiation risks from electrophysiology procedures compared to coronary angiography.
    Smith IR; Rivers JT; Hayes J; Stafford W; Codd C
    Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 19119073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of fluoroscopic cases qualifying as potential fluoroscopic sentinel events.
    Weinberg BD; Vance A; Arbique GM; Guild JB; Anderson J; Chason DP
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 23498987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Efforts to optimize radiation protection in interventional fluoroscopy.
    Miller DL
    Health Phys; 2013 Nov; 105(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 24077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Iatrogenic fluoroscopy injury to the skin.
    Otterburn D; Losken A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Nov; 65(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 20948414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations.
    Olgar T; Bor D; Berkmen G; Yazar T
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):393-407. PubMed ID: 19690354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Importance of dose settings in the x-ray systems used for interventional radiology: a national survey.
    Vano E; Sanchez R; Fernandez JM; Rosales F; Garcia MA; Sotil J; Hernandez J; Carrera F; Ciudad J; Soler MM; Ballester T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19052816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. What is dose area product?
    Schubert R
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(5):329-30. PubMed ID: 7644614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. How 'do's' and 'dont's' can be of significant importance in radiation protection: a case report.
    Widmark A; Friberg EG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):99-101. PubMed ID: 21733863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A large-scale multicentre study in Belgium of dose area product values and effective doses in interventional cardiology using contemporary X-ray equipment.
    Bogaert E; Bacher K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 17681964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.