111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679199)
1. Plane orientation for standardization in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with computerized tomography imaging.
Lagravère MO; Hansen L; Harzer W; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16679199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed reference point for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography.
Lagravère MO; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 16286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization analysis for plane orientation in 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis of serial cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Secanell M; Major PW; Carey JP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 21569990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Major PW; Carey J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):400-8. PubMed ID: 20841457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Landmarks of the Frankfort horizontal plane : Reliability in a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system.
Hofmann E; Fimmers R; Schmid M; Hirschfelder U; Detterbeck A; Hertrich K
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 27502792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of cephalometric landmark identification on three-dimensional computed tomographic images.
Kim JH; An S; Hwang DM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 60(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 34690019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual pathway-related horizontal reference plane for three-dimensional craniofacial analysis.
Kang YH; Kim BC; Park KR; Yon JY; Kim HJ; Tak HJ; Piao Z; Kim MK; Lee SH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 23020695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional reproducibility of natural head position.
Weber DW; Fallis DW; Packer MD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 23631976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mandibular advancement on the natural position of the head: a preliminary study of 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Lin X; Liu Y; Edwards SP
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):e178-82. PubMed ID: 23566537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.
Swennen GR; Schutyser F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):410-6. PubMed ID: 16979502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
