BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679282)

  • 1. Digitizing and consolidating mammograms and other images for teaching applications.
    Bassignani MJ; LoRusso AP; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 16679282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced teaching of screening mammography using an electronic format.
    LoRusso AP; Bassignani MJ; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):782-8. PubMed ID: 16679283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Qualitative JPEG 2000 compression in digital mammography - evaluation using 480 mammograms of the CDMAM phantom.
    Schreiter NF; Steffen IG; Miller J; Fallenberg E; Poellinger A; Bick U; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 21667423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dye enhancement for digital mammograms.
    Health News; 2003 Dec; 9(12):6. PubMed ID: 14679963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Auto-shutter of CR/DR images and applications in the post-image processing of PACS].
    Gao BB; Zhang JG
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 16830801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of new image processing conditions for digital mammograms from Fuji computed radiography.
    Kano H; Endo T; Ikeda M; Oiwa M; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):131-8. PubMed ID: 16967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms.
    Bick U; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
    Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11. PubMed ID: 8946544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Compression of digital images in radiology - results of a consensus conference].
    Loose R; Braunschweig R; Kotter E; Mildenberger P; Simmler R; Wucherer M
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19115165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gray scale registration of mammograms using a model of image acquisition.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():401-12. PubMed ID: 15344475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward virtual anatomy: a stereoscopic 3-D interactive multimedia computer program for cranial osteology.
    Trelease RB
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 8793223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reinventing the apprenticeship: the hot seat in the digital era.
    Su TJ; Shaffer K
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1300-7. PubMed ID: 15561580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. www.tnt-radiology.de: Teach and be taught radiology: implementation of a web-based training program based on user preferences as determined by survery.
    Grunewald M; Ketelsen D; Heckemann RA; Zenk J; Schick C; Bison B; Anders D; Knickenberg I; Wagner M; Neuhuber W; Bickel A; Bautz W; Greess H
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 16554226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
    Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Numerical revolution in radiology].
    Hoogewoud HM; Girard JM
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2001 Aug; 121(8):591-4. PubMed ID: 11565222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.