These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP. Kang M; Day CA; DiBenedetto E; Kenworthy AK Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):2737-47. PubMed ID: 21044570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: the case of anomalous diffusion. Lubelski A; Klafter J Biophys J; 2008 Jun; 94(12):4646-53. PubMed ID: 18326658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative interpretation of binding reactions of rapidly diffusing species using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Tsibidis GD J Microsc; 2009 Mar; 233(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19250459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP. Tolentino TP; Wu J; Zarnitsyna VI; Fang Y; Dustin ML; Zhu C Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):920-30. PubMed ID: 18390627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching Analysis of the Diffusional Mobility of Plasma Membrane Proteins: HER3 Mobility in Breast Cancer Cell Membranes. Sarkar M; Koland JG Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1376():97-105. PubMed ID: 26552678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inferences from FRAP data are model dependent: A subdiffusive analysis. Alexander AM; Lawley SD Biophys J; 2022 Oct; 121(20):3795-3810. PubMed ID: 36127879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A coupled diffusion-kinetics model for analysis of contact-area FRAP experiment. Wu J; Fang Y; Zarnitsyna VI; Tolentino TP; Dustin ML; Zhu C Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):910-9. PubMed ID: 18390628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel in situ assay for the identification and characterization of soluble nuclear mobility factors. Elbi C; Walker DA; Lewis M; Romero G; Sullivan WP; Toft DO; Hager GL; DeFranco DB Sci STKE; 2004 Jun; 2004(238):pl10. PubMed ID: 15213337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A reaction-diffusion model to study RNA motion by quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Braga J; McNally JG; Carmo-Fonseca M Biophys J; 2007 Apr; 92(8):2694-703. PubMed ID: 17259280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Determining diffusion coefficients in inhomogeneous tissues using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Sniekers YH; van Donkelaar CC Biophys J; 2005 Aug; 89(2):1302-7. PubMed ID: 15894637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to study nuclear protein dynamics in living cells. van Royen ME; Farla P; Mattern KA; Geverts B; Trapman J; Houtsmuller AB Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 464():363-85. PubMed ID: 18951195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of Protein Kinetics Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP). Giakoumakis NN; Rapsomaniki MA; Lygerou Z Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1563():243-267. PubMed ID: 28324613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching reveals the biochemistry of nucleocytoplasmic exchange. Bizzarri R; Cardarelli F; Serresi M; Beltram F Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Jun; 403(8):2339-51. PubMed ID: 22585053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parameter estimation in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: quantitative analysis of protein binding reactions and diffusion. Williamson DE; Sahai E; Jenkins RP; O'Dea RD; King JR J Math Biol; 2021 Jun; 83(1):1. PubMed ID: 34129100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of biomolecular dynamics by FRAP and computer simulation. Geverts B; van Royen ME; Houtsmuller AB Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1251():109-33. PubMed ID: 25391797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Highly Accurate Pixel-Based FRAP Model Based on Spectral-Domain Numerical Methods. Röding M; Lacroix L; Krona A; Gebäck T; Lorén N Biophys J; 2019 Apr; 116(7):1348-1361. PubMed ID: 30878198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]