These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679438)

  • 21. Caregivers' ratings of access: do children with special health care needs fare better under fee-for-service or partially capitated managed care?
    Mitchell JM; Gaskin DJ
    Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 17224777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Getting it all done. Organizational factors linked with comprehensive primary care.
    Russell G; Dahrouge S; Tuna M; Hogg W; Geneau R; Gebremichael G
    Fam Pract; 2010 Oct; 27(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 20534791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primary care provider turnover and quality in managed care organizations.
    Plomondon ME; Magid DJ; Steiner JF; MaWhinney S; Gifford BD; Shih SC; Grunwald GK; Rumsfeld JS
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Aug; 13(8):465-72. PubMed ID: 17685827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AIDS advocates, caregivers must play major role in managed care debates.
    AIDS Alert; 1996 May; 11(5):49-52. PubMed ID: 11363249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of ambulatory care-sensitive hospital discharge rates for Medicaid HMO enrollees and nonenrollees.
    Porell FW
    Med Care Res Rev; 2001 Dec; 58(4):404-24; discussion 425-9. PubMed ID: 11759197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wisconsin study compares managed care, fee-for-service Medicaid utilization rates.
    Capitation Rates Data; 1997; 2():71-2. PubMed ID: 11066342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring access to effective care among elderly medicare enrollees in managed and Fee-for-Service care: a retrospective cohort study.
    Barton MB; Dayhoff DA; Soumerai SB; Rosenbach ML; Fletcher RH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2001; 1():11. PubMed ID: 11716798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicaid managed care: a system in transition.
    Proj Inf Perspect; 1997 Nov; (23):21-3. PubMed ID: 11365377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The implementation of Medicaid managed care for pregnant women in Ohio: a case study.
    Sommers AS; Howell EM
    Manag Care Interface; 2003 Oct; 16(10):27-31, 34. PubMed ID: 14606257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality improvement efforts in prenatal care for Oklahoma Medicaid managed care patients: 1995-1998.
    Millar JS; Winston T; McCauley D; Mitchell L; Hays C
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Jan; 95(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 11799801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medicare. Private fee-for-service plans under scrutiny.
    Carpenter D
    Hosp Health Netw; 2007 Aug; 81(8):20. PubMed ID: 17874810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences in HMO and fee-for-service health care.
    Piña DL
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 1998 Nov; 9(4):433-48. PubMed ID: 10073218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beyond health plans: behavioral health disorders and quality of diabetes and asthma care for Medicaid beneficiaries.
    Clark RE; Weir S; Ouellette RA; Zhang J; Baxter JD
    Med Care; 2009 May; 47(5):545-52. PubMed ID: 19319000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. By the numbers. Consumer satisfaction with health plans.
    Stanton M
    Healthplan; 1997; 38(5):67-8. PubMed ID: 10182884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. HMO care not much different from fee-for-service care, study finds.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Aug; 51(16):1994-5. PubMed ID: 7977416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving access to dental care for New York State's Medicaid recipients.
    Shub JL
    N Y State Dent J; 2001 Oct; 67(8):38-47. PubMed ID: 11680130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating quality of care in fee-for-service and managed care delivery systems: recommendations for quality leaders.
    Kelly JT; Kelly JM
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1995 Apr; 7(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 10142331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Racial/ethnic differences in quality of care for North Carolina Medicaid recipients.
    DuBard CA; Yow A; Bostrom S; Attiah E; Griffith B; Lawrence W
    N C Med J; 2009; 70(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 19489363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transitioning a provider community from fee-for-service to managed care.
    Carey KP
    J Healthc Manag; 2001; 46(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 11372222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Philadelphia Health Insurance Organization: the results of managed health care for 96,000 medical assistance recipients.
    Temple PC; Kron S
    Health Matrix; 1989-1990 Winter; 7(4):12-20. PubMed ID: 10304258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.