These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16679686)

  • 1. A shift from significance test to hypothesis test through power analysis in medical research.
    Singh G
    J Postgrad Med; 2006; 52(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 16679686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health care research: alternative approaches to study design and data analysis.
    Baghi H
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2008; 17(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 19020400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement Dog.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    Psychol Rep; 2016 Oct; 119(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 27502529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to test hypotheses if you must.
    Grieve AP
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 25641830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students.
    Taylor S; Muncer S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing.
    Perezgonzalez JD
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():223. PubMed ID: 25784889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-tailed significance tests for 2 × 2 contingency tables: What is the alternative?
    Prescott RJ
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4264-4269. PubMed ID: 31264237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests of Statistical Significance Made Sound.
    Haig BD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 77(3):489-506. PubMed ID: 29795925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the effect size and its measures.
    Ialongo C
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016; 26(2):150-63. PubMed ID: 27346958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The uncertainties of statistical "significance"].
    Domenech RJ
    Rev Med Chil; 2018 Dec; 146(10):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 30724983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive designs based on the truncated product method.
    Neuhäuser M; Bretz F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Sep; 5():30. PubMed ID: 16171518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Things we still haven't learned (so far).
    Ivarsson A; Andersen MB; Stenling A; Johnson U; Lindwall M
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):449-61. PubMed ID: 26442774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.