These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16680130)

  • 1. The human use of humanoid beings: chimeras and patent law.
    Rabin S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 16680130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
    Bagley MA
    William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The attack of the clones: patent law and stem cell research.
    Rimmer M
    J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):488-505. PubMed ID: 12852321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patenting human beings: do sub-human creatures deserve constitutional protection?
    Fishman RE
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):461-82. PubMed ID: 2699160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patents on human-animal chimeras and threats to human dignity.
    Resnik DB
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):35-6. PubMed ID: 14594487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
    Merges RP
    MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human-nonhuman chimeras: a regulatory proposal on the blurring of species lines.
    Kopinksi NE
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 2004 May; 45(3):619-66. PubMed ID: 16514749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe.
    Fleck B; Baldock C
    Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Owning the secret of life: biotechnology and property rights revisited.
    Yelpaala K
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):111-219. PubMed ID: 15709267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotech patents: the world is your oyster--or mouse--or (you name it).
    Alix JE
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Sep; 4(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 8931235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tying Prometheus down: the international law of human genetic manipulation.
    Marks SP
    Chic J Int Law; 2002; 3(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 15709303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive.
    Van Overwalle G
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The human chimera patent initiative.
    Newman SA
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2002; 9(1):4, 7. PubMed ID: 15584183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law?
    Caulfield TA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 12628363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The monster's laws: a legal history of chimera research.
    Appel JM
    Genewatch; 2006; 19(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 16789302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Patents on life? No patent on life!].
    van Raden L
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 105(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 9581373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Needed: a modest proposal.
    Baylis F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 18183667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating clones, kids & chimera: liberal democratic compromise at the crossroads.
    Adams NA
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):71-149. PubMed ID: 14986647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.