216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16681098)
1. [Confidentiality threatened if physicians are to report drivers who pose a danger to traffic].
Malv H
Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 5-11; 103(14):1125; author reply 1126. PubMed ID: 16681098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Confidentiality contra public welfare when driving under influence is suspected].
Schöldström U
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(41):3178. PubMed ID: 15517718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PennDOT reporting regulations: an ethical duty, not an option.
Hoepfer M
Pa Med; 1993 Dec; 96(12):36-7. PubMed ID: 8127598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. At risk drivers: are physicians required to report?
Hansotia P
Wis Med J; 1997 May; 96(5):7. PubMed ID: 9214152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [What can the physician do in order to improve the traffic safety?].
Ojala M
Duodecim; 1999; 115(6):685-6. PubMed ID: 11859501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to report drivers' medical problems could have serious legal consequences for MDs.
Johnston C
CMAJ; 1993 Aug; 149(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 8305009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining medical fitness to drive: physicians' responsibilities in Canada.
Coopersmith HG; Korner-Bitensky NA; Mayo NE
CMAJ; 1989 Feb; 140(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 2914258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Must physicians report impaired driving? Rethinking a duty on a collision course with itself.
Appel J
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19554818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical challenges posed by dementia and driving.
Berger JT; Rosner F
J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 11252911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Physicians, health and drivers licence].
Braekhus A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Oct; 125(19):2609. PubMed ID: 16215600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An impaired judicial system.
Workman S
CMAJ; 1997 Jun; 156(12):1698. PubMed ID: 9220918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. MDs still the key to eliminating unfit drivers, jury decides.
Gray C; Sullivan P
CMAJ; 2002 Apr; 166(9):1196. PubMed ID: 12000257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidentiality and fitness to drive: Professional, ethical, and legal duties in the case of the diabetic bus driver.
Wareham C
S Afr Med J; 2017 Jul; 107(8):684-686. PubMed ID: 28809614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandatory physician reporting of drivers with cardiac disease: ethical and practical considerations.
Simpson CS; Hoffmaster B; Mitchell LB; Klein GJ
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 20(13):1329-34. PubMed ID: 15565196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician's duty to breach a patient's confidentiality.
Carrier PH
Nebr Med J; 1989 Jun; 74(6):140-4. PubMed ID: 2755532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Denying a patient's final will: public safety vs. medical confidentiality and patient autonomy.
Gaertner J; Vent J; Greinwald R; Rothschild MA; Ostgathe C; Kessel R; Voltz R
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Dec; 42(6):961-6. PubMed ID: 22137424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical professionals helping with the drunk driving problem.
Onder JJ
J Fla Med Assoc; 1984 Apr; 71(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 6736911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Drunken drivers: what should doctors do? Aberdeen Medical Group.
J Med Ethics; 1986 Sep; 12(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 3761337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Oregon's law mandating physician reporting of impaired drivers.
Snyder KM; Ganzini L
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol; 2009 Sep; 22(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 19307323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The duty to report patients who are unfit to drive.
Coates J
N Z Med J; 2001 Oct; 114(1141):453. PubMed ID: 11700774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
