195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16681679)
1. A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies.
Melia J; Moseley R; Ball RY; Griffiths DF; Grigor K; Harnden P; Jarmulowicz M; McWilliam LJ; Montironi R; Waller M; Moss S; Parkinson MC
Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):644-54. PubMed ID: 16681679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibility.
Griffiths DF; Melia J; McWilliam LJ; Ball RY; Grigor K; Harnden P; Jarmulowicz M; Montironi R; Moseley R; Waller M; Moss S; Parkinson MC
Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 16681680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver agreement of Gleason score and modified Gleason score in needle biopsy and in surgical specimen of prostate cancer.
Veloso SG; Lima MF; Salles PG; Berenstein CK; Scalon JD; Bambirra EA
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(5):639-46; discussion 647-51. PubMed ID: 17980061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.
Helin H; Lundin M; Lundin J; Martikainen P; Tammela T; Helin H; van der Kwast T; Isola J
Hum Pathol; 2005 Apr; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15891999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Meysamie A; Sheikhbahaei S; Ahmadi A; Moradi-Tabriz H; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Urol J; 2012; 9(2):486-90. PubMed ID: 22641492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian belief network for the Gleason patterns in prostatic adenocarcinoma: development of a diagnostic decision support system for educational purposes.
Montironi R; Ball RY; Griffiths DF; Grigor K; Harnden PM; Jarmulowicz M; McWilliam LJ; Moseley RP; Parkinson MC; Santinelli A; Moss SM; Melia JW
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2008 Feb; 30(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18459582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsies by general pathologists.
Renshaw AA; Schultz D; Cote K; Loffredo M; Ziemba DE; D'Amico AV
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Aug; 127(8):1007-8. PubMed ID: 12873176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of prostate biopsy secondary pathology review on radiotherapy management.
Siedow M; Eisner M; Yaney A; Washington I; Zynger D; Martin D; Mo X; Diconstanzo D; Diaz DA
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 34698410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring interobserver variation in a pathology EQA scheme using weighted κ for multiple readers.
Wright KC; Melia J; Moss S; Berney DM; Coleman D; Harnden P
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1128-31. PubMed ID: 21836039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
