135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16683084)
21. RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment.
Therasse P; Eisenhauer EA; Verweij J
Eur J Cancer; 2006 May; 42(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 16616487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in lung cancer screening with computed tomography.
Abe Y; Hanai K; Nakano M; Ohkubo Y; Hasizume T; Kakizaki T; Nakamura M; Niki N; Eguchi K; Fujino T; Moriyama N
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(1B):483-8. PubMed ID: 15816616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment "RECIST"].
Sasaki T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Dec; 27(14):2179-84. PubMed ID: 11142160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels.
Bolte H; Jahnke T; Schäfer FK; Wenke R; Hoffmann B; Freitag-Wolf S; Dicken V; Kuhnigk JM; Lohmann J; Voss S; Knöss N; Heller M; Biederer J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):285-95. PubMed ID: 17433595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of inter-observer variability according to RECIST 1.1 and its influence on response classification in CT measurement of liver metastases.
Bellomi M; De Piano F; Ancona E; Lodigiani AF; Curigliano G; Raimondi S; Preda L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 95():96-101. PubMed ID: 28987705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements.
Goodman LR; Gulsun M; Washington L; Nagy PG; Piacsek KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Apr; 186(4):989-94. PubMed ID: 16554568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computed tomography-based lung nodule volumetry--do optimized reconstructions of routine protocols achieve similar accuracy, reproducibility and interobserver variability to that of special volumetry protocols?
Bolte H; Riedel C; Knöss N; Freitag S; Hoffmann B; Heller M; Biederer J
Rofo; 2007 Mar; 179(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 17325995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurement to assess therapeutic response in the treatment of solid tumors].
Hauth EA; Stattaus J; Forsting M
Radiologe; 2007 Jul; 47(7):628, 630-4. PubMed ID: 16440191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contribution of CAD to the Sensitivity for Detecting Lung Metastases on Thin-Section CT - A Prospective Study with Surgical and Histopathological Correlation.
Meybaum C; Graff M; Fallenberg EM; Leschber G; Wormanns D
Rofo; 2020 Jan; 192(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 31370088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Variability in the quantification of abrasion on the Bruxcore device.
Isacsson G; Bodin L; Seldén A; Barregård L
J Orofac Pain; 1996; 10(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 9161241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new digital image analysis system useful for surface assessment of vitiligo lesions in transplantation studies.
Van Geel N; Vander Haeghen Y; Ongenae K; Naeyaert JM
Eur J Dermatol; 2004; 14(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 15246939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing treatment response of osteolytic lesions by manual volumetry, automatic segmentation, and RECIST in experimental bone metastases.
Bretschi M; Fränzle A; Merz M; Hillengass J; Semmler W; Bendl R; Bäuerle T
Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1177-84. PubMed ID: 24998693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pulmonary metastases: effect of CT section thickness on measurement--initial experience.
Zhao B; Schwartz LH; Moskowitz CS; Wang L; Ginsberg MS; Cooper CA; Jiang L; Kalaigian JP
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):934-9. PubMed ID: 15681690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.
Wulff AM; Bolte H; Fischer S; Freitag-Wolf S; Soza G; Tietjen C; Biederer J; Heller M; Fabel M
Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):820-8. PubMed ID: 22872601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines.
Prasad SR; Saini S; Sumner JE; Hahn PF; Sahani D; Boland GW
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(3):380-4. PubMed ID: 12794603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of volumetric and linear serial CT assessments of lung metastases in renal cell carcinoma patients in a clinical phase IIB study.
Dicken V; Bornemann L; Moltz JH; Peitgen HO; Zaim S; Scheuring U
Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 25778472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intra- and interobserver variability of linear and volumetric measurements of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Bauknecht HC; Romano VC; Rogalla P; Klingebiel R; Wolf C; Bornemann L; Hamm B; Hein PA
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jan; 45(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19996757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Response assessment in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: can response evaluation criteria in solid tumors replace three-dimensional volume assessments?
Schoot RA; McHugh K; van Rijn RR; Kremer LC; Chisholm JC; Caron HN; Merks JH
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):870-8. PubMed ID: 23985275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Radiological evaluation of tumor response in oncological studies (tumor response evaluation)].
Gebauer B; Bohnsack O; Riess H
Rofo; 2011 Aug; 183(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 21391174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Zhao B; James LP; Moskowitz CS; Guo P; Ginsberg MS; Lefkowitz RA; Qin Y; Riely GJ; Kris MG; Schwartz LH
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):263-72. PubMed ID: 19561260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
