These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Reduction of arterial partial volume effects for improved absolute quantification of DSC-MRI perfusion estimates: comparison between tail scaling and prebolus administration. Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Markenroth Bloch K; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 24664642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study. Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correcting the effects of background microcirculation in the measurement of arterial input functions using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI of the brain. Thornton RJ; Jones JY; Wang ZJ Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):619-23. PubMed ID: 16735184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of blood ΔR2* non-linearity on absolute perfusion quantification using DSC-MRI: comparison with Xe-133 SPECT. Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R; van Osch MJ Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):651-5. PubMed ID: 23375837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A linear mixed perfusion model for tissue partial volume correction of perfusion estimates in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Impact on absolute quantification, repeatability, and agreement with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Ahlgren A; Wirestam R; Lind E; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jun; 77(6):2203-2214. PubMed ID: 27321696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of regional tracer delay on CBF in healthy subjects measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison with 15O-PET. Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Ishigame K; Ito H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I Magn Reson Med Sci; 2005; 4(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16127251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T. Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Mehndiratta A; MacIntosh BJ; Crane DE; Payne SJ; Chappell MA Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():560-70. PubMed ID: 22975158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved residue function and reduced flow dependence in MR perfusion using least-absolute-deviation regularization. Wong KK; Tam CP; Ng M; Wong ST; Young GS Magn Reson Med; 2009 Feb; 61(2):418-28. PubMed ID: 19161133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images. Chen JJ; Frayne R; Smith MR Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1251-63. PubMed ID: 15798320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Kimura T; Kusahara H Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging. Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]