These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16683880)

  • 21. Consensus statement on effective communication of urgent diagnoses and significant, unexpected diagnoses in surgical pathology and cytopathology from the College of American Pathologists and Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
    Nakhleh RE; Myers JL; Allen TC; DeYoung BR; Fitzgibbons PL; Funkhouser WK; Mody DR; Lynn A; Fatheree LA; Smith AT; Lal A; Silverman JF
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 136(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 21992705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determining customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology.
    Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):645-9. PubMed ID: 16683881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Significant and unexpected versus critical results in surgical pathology.
    Sarewitz SJ; Williams RB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Sep; 133(9):1366. PubMed ID: 19722739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medicolegal aspects of telepathology.
    Leung ST; Kaplan KJ
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1137-42. PubMed ID: 19368955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Current State of Communication of Urgent and Significant, Unexpected Diagnoses in Anatomic Pathology.
    Staats PN; Parkash V; Otis CN; Sharma P; Ioffe O; Bracamonte ER
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Sep; 144(9):1067-1074. PubMed ID: 32023089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Errors by surgical pathologists in India: results of a questionnaire survey.
    Pai SA
    Natl Med J India; 2003; 16(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 14606768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Pathologist Workforce in the United States: II. An Interactive Modeling Tool for Analyzing Future Qualitative and Quantitative Staffing Demands for Services.
    Robboy SJ; Gupta S; Crawford JM; Cohen MB; Karcher DS; Leonard DG; Magnani B; Novis DA; Prystowsky MB; Powell SZ; Gross DJ; Black-Schaffer WS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1413-30. PubMed ID: 26516939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dermatopathologist assessment of "pathologist-to-dermatologist" communication for dermatopathology services.
    Sheikh UA; Sufficool KE; Buchanan P; Armbrecht ES; Burkemper NM; Vidal CI
    J Cutan Pathol; 2020 Apr; 47(4):328-338. PubMed ID: 31837051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. "Apologies" from pathologists: why, when, and how to say "sorry" after committing a medical error.
    Dewar R; Parkash V; Forrow L; Truog RD
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2014 May; 22(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 23667133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using the electronic medical record to better define "no products of conception" as a critical value in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 22180485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Critical diagnoses in surgical pathology: a retrospective single-institution study to monitor guidelines for communication of urgent results.
    Huang EC; Kuo FC; Fletcher CD; Nosé V
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1098-102. PubMed ID: 19390422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of physician extenders in surgical pathology practice.
    Grzybicki DM; Vrbin CM; Reilly TL; Zarbo RJ; Raab SS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 128(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 14736288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Data Representation, Coding, and Communication Standards.
    Amin M; Dhir R
    Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Jun; 8(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 26065786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Critical values in cytology.
    Onken AM; VanderLaan PA; Rosenbaum MW
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(4):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology.
    Daniel C; García Rojo M; Bourquard K; Henin D; Schrader T; Della Mea V; Gilbertson J; Beckwith BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Nov; 133(11):1841-9. PubMed ID: 19886721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving Pathologists' Communication Skills.
    Dintzis S
    AMA J Ethics; 2016 Aug; 18(8):802-8. PubMed ID: 27550564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
    Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The pathologists' assistant. Distribution, use, and employer perceptions.
    Neri RA; Keshgegian AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jan; 85(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 3940427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pathologists' Perspectives on Disclosing Harmful Pathology Error.
    Dintzis SM; Clennon EK; Prouty CD; Reich LM; Elmore JG; Gallagher TH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):841-845. PubMed ID: 28362155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
    Novis DA
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.