110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16684580)
1. Prioritisation by physicians in the Netherlands--the growth hormone example in drug reimbursement decisions.
de Bont A; Zandwijken G; Stolk E; Niessen L
Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):369-77. PubMed ID: 16684580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conditional reimbursement within the Dutch drug policy.
Niezen M; de Bont A; Stolk E; Eyck A; Niessen L; Stoevelaar H
Health Policy; 2007 Nov; 84(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 17207886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finding legitimacy for the role of budget impact in drug reimbursement decisions.
Niezen MG; de Bont A; Busschbach JJ; Cohen JP; Stolk EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jan; 25(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 19126251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the selection of patients for anti-retroviral treatment in Uganda fair? A qualitative study.
Sofaer N; Kapiriri L; Atuyambe LM; Otolok-Tanga E; Norheim OF
Health Policy; 2009 Jun; 91(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19070932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. National HIV treatment guidelines in Tanzania and Ethiopia: are they legitimate rationing tools?
Johansson KA; Jerene D; Norheim OF
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 18511624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing accountability for reasonableness--the case of pharmaceutical reimbursement in Sweden.
Jansson S
Health Econ Policy Law; 2007 Apr; 2(Pt 2):153-71. PubMed ID: 18634660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethically acceptable prioritisation of childless couples and treatment rationing: "accountability for reasonableness".
Lindström H; Waldau S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 18417271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Drug evaluation by the French National Health Authority for reimbursement decisions].
Bouvenot G
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2005 Nov; 189(8):1683-90; discussion 1690-1. PubMed ID: 16737094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
Schlander M
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making.
Boivin A; Légaré F; Gagnon MP
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Apr; 13(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18416912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for reasonableness: Exploring the personal internal framework affecting decisions about cancer drug funding.
Sinclair S; Hagen NA; Chambers C; Manns B; Simon A; Browman GP
Health Policy; 2008 May; 86(2-3):381-90. PubMed ID: 18243395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting.
Feiring E; Wang H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):342. PubMed ID: 29743065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local prioritisation work in health care--assessment of an implementation process.
Waldau S
Health Policy; 2007 May; 81(2-3):133-45. PubMed ID: 16824642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
Rid A
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19103936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.
Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
