119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16684920)
1. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Han BK; Kim EK; Kim MH; Chung SY; Choi HY; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16684920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chung SY; Park SH; Park JM; Han BK; Choe YH; Cho G; Im JG
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 16304106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Kim SM; Park SH; Han BK; Choe YH; Park JM; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17090709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules: comparison of 2- and 3- dimensional sonography.
Jang M; Kim SM; Lyou CY; Choi BS; Choi SI; Kim JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 22298862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US--influence on radiologist accuracy.
Cho N; Jang M; Lyou CY; Park JS; Choi HY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 22084209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses.
Cho KR; Seo BK; Lee JY; Pisano ED; Je BK; Lee JY; Choi EJ; Chung KB; Whan Oh Y
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 15899337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Bailey JE; Nees AV; Blane CE; Adler DD; Patterson SK; Klein KA; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):810-8. PubMed ID: 19375953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.
Burnside ES; Hall TJ; Sommer AM; Hesley GK; Sisney GA; Svensson WE; Fine JP; Jiang J; Hangiandreou NJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 17940302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Solid breast masses: neural network analysis of vascular features at three-dimensional power Doppler US for benign or malignant classification.
Chang RF; Huang SF; Moon WK; Lee YH; Chen DR
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17312276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions.
Cho N; Kim SM; Park JS; Jang M; Kim SY; Chang JM; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1520-6. PubMed ID: 21498016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional targeting: a new three-dimensional ultrasound technique to evaluate needle position during breast biopsy.
Weismann CF; Forstner R; Prokop E; Rettenbacher T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 16(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 11169313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction.
Zhu Q; Cronin EB; Currier AA; Vine HS; Huang M; Chen N; Xu C
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 16183924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
