1158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16685296)
21. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11203548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft in the treatment of multiple marginal gingival recession defects.
Thombre V; Koudale SB; Bhongade ML
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):e88-94. PubMed ID: 23593633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio E; Zuza EP; Marcantonio RA
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions.
Carvalho PF; da Silva RC; Cury PR; Joly JC
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1901-6. PubMed ID: 17076617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft.
Andrade PF; Felipe ME; Novaes AB; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Grisi MF
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 35(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 18269666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: a pilot study.
Joly JC; Carvalho AM; da Silva RC; Ciotti DL; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17539714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Öncü E
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 28196169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage.
Ricci G; Silvestri M; Tinti C; Rasperini G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two-step procedure for root coverage using a free gingival graft and a subepthelial connective tissue graft.
Vijayendra R; Suchetha A; Jaganath S; Gurfan K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):478-81. PubMed ID: 22048593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acellular dermal matrix allograft. The results of controlled randomized clinical studies.
Novaes AB; de Barros RR
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Oct; 10(4):123-9. PubMed ID: 19055225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Tözüm TF; Keçeli HG; Güncü GN; Hatipoğlu H; Sengün D
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 16274302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
