BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16685543)

  • 1. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis.
    Moumoulidis I; Draper MR; Patel H; Jani P; Price T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 263(8):719-22. PubMed ID: 16685543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of side effects and patient perceptions towards Rapid Rhino and Merocel packs in epistaxis.
    Mettias B; Karia CT; Irvine E; Conboy P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Jun; 138(6):642-646. PubMed ID: 38230503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.
    Singer AJ; Blanda M; Cronin K; LoGiudice-Khwaja M; Gulla J; Bradshaw J; Katz A
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 45(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15671968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Rhino versus Merocel nasal packs in septal surgery.
    Hesham A; Ghali A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1244-6. PubMed ID: 21854674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A meta-analysis compare rapid rhino with merocel for nasal packing].
    Yang X; Yi K; Tian J; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 26(14):655-60. PubMed ID: 23156811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and RapidRhino packing in the management of anterior epistaxis.
    Badran K; Malik TH; Belloso A; Timms MS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 30(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 16209675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the use of merocel nasal tampons and BIPP in the control of acute epistaxis.
    Corbridge RJ; Djazaeri B; Hellier WP; Hadley J
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1995 Aug; 20(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 8548959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery.
    Ozcan C; Vayisoglu Y; Kiliç S; Görür K
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(6):826-31. PubMed ID: 19128711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intranasal packs and haemostatic agents for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review.
    Iqbal IZ; Jones GH; Dawe N; Mamais C; Smith ME; Williams RJ; Kuhn I; Carrie S
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Dec; 131(12):1065-1092. PubMed ID: 29280695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.
    Arya AK; Butt O; Nigam A
    Rhinology; 2003 Dec; 41(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 14750352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of Merocel nasal packs in the treatment of epistaxis.
    Pringle MB; Beasley P; Brightwell AP
    J Laryngol Otol; 1996 Jun; 110(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 8763373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three different polyvinyl alcohol packs following functional endoscopic Nasal surgery.
    Melis A; Karligkiotis A; Bozzo C; Machouchas N; Volpi L; Castiglia P; Castelnuovo P; Meloni F
    Laryngoscope; 2015 May; 125(5):1067-71. PubMed ID: 25545810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid Rhino: A new pneumatic nasal tamponade for posterior epistaxis.
    Gudziol V; Mewes T; Mann WJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Jan; 132(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 15632931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swallowed nasal pack: a rare but serious complication of the management of epistaxis.
    Hashmi SM; Gopaul SR; Prinsley PR; Sansom JR
    J Laryngol Otol; 2004 May; 118(5):372-3. PubMed ID: 15165314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Massive pneumocephalus following Merocel nasal tamponade for epistaxis.
    Hollis GJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2000 Sep; 7(9):1073-4. PubMed ID: 11044008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early discharge following nasal pack removal: is it feasible?
    Mehanna H; Abdelkader M; Albahnasawy L; Johnston A
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2002 Jun; 27(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 12071987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between pressure and volume when using Rapid Rhino(r) packs in the management of epistaxis.
    Mackeith S; Hettige R; Falzon A; Draper M
    Rhinology; 2011 Oct; 49(4):470-3. PubMed ID: 21991574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised controlled trial comparing Rapid Rhino Mannheim and Netcell series 5000 packs following routine nasal surgery.
    McDonald SE; Slater J; Powell R; Khalil HS; Garth RJ
    Rhinology; 2009 Mar; 47(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 19382493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery".
    Ho WK
    Rhinology; 2004 Dec; 42(4):255; author reply 255. PubMed ID: 15626265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study to determine the benefits of bilateral versus unilateral nasal packing with Rapid Rhino ® packs.
    Hettige R; Mackeith S; Falzon A; Draper M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 271(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 23765062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.