148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16685543)
21. Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea after nasal packing for epistaxis: case report.
Edkins O; Nyamarebvu CT; Lubbe D
J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Apr; 126(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 22361138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rapid Rhino nasal packs: demonstration of depressurisation but not deflation.
Smyth C; Hanna B; Scally C
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 18926004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early operative intervention versus conventional treatment in epistaxis: randomized prospective trial.
Moshaver A; Harris JR; Liu R; Diamond C; Seikaly H
J Otolaryngol; 2004 Jun; 33(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 15841998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Surgicel Nu-knit, Merocel and Vasolene gauze nasal packs: a randomized trial.
Shinkwin CA; Beasley N; Simo R; Rushton L; Jones NS
Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 8739869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of duration of merocel in glove finger with tetracaine solution on septoplasty morbidity.
Çelik Ö; Boyaci Z; Ateşpare A; Develioğlu O; Karaca Ç; Çaglar E; Vural Ç
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):1931-4. PubMed ID: 24220376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nasal Packs for Epistaxis: Predictors of Success.
INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)
Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 45(5):659-666. PubMed ID: 32306506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A double-blind randomised controlled trial of gloved versus ungloved merocel middle meatal spacers for endoscopic sinus surgery.
Akbari E; Philpott CM; Ostry AJ; Clark A; Javer AR
Rhinology; 2012 Sep; 50(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 22888489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analgesia and removal of nasal packing.
Laing MR; Clark LJ
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Aug; 15(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 2225503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. One size fits all? A novel application of the adult Merocel epistaxis pack.
Possamai VJ; Griffiths H
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Mar; 121(3):299. PubMed ID: 17125572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating Effectiveness of Nasal Compression With Tranexamic Acid Compared With Simple Nasal Compression and Merocel Packing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Akkan S; Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aytar H; Emektar E; Dağar S; Çevik Y
Ann Emerg Med; 2019 Jul; 74(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 31080025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery.
Garth RJ; Brightwell AP
J Laryngol Otol; 1994 Jul; 108(7):564-6. PubMed ID: 7930890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Post-turbinectomy nasal packing with Merocel versus glove finger Merocel: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abu Eta R; Eviatar E; Pitaro J; Gavriel H
Ear Nose Throat J; 2018 Mar; 97(3):64-68. PubMed ID: 29554399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Nasal packing in posterior epistaxis. Comparison of two methods].
García Callejo FJ; Muñoz Fernández N; Achiques Martínez MT; Frías Moya-Angeler S; Montoro Elena MJ; Algarra JM
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2010; 61(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 20137770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anterior nasal packing with merocel: a modification.
Visvanathan V
Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 33(5):510. PubMed ID: 18983409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Management of Persistent Epistaxis Using Floseal Hemostatic Matrix vs. traditional nasal packing: a prospective randomized control trial.
Murray S; Mendez A; Hopkins A; El-Hakim H; Jeffery CC; Côté DWJ
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 29310703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Discomfort and costs in epistaxis treatment.
Nikolaou G; Holzmann D; Soyka MB
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 270(8):2239-44. PubMed ID: 23292039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The pain of nasal tampon removal after nasal surgery: a randomized control trial.
Chheda N; Katz AE; Gynizio L; Singer AJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 140(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 19201291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of nasal pack removal on patients' anxiety after septoplasty.
Şahin C; İmer Aras H
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2015; 25(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 26476513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do all epistaxis patients with a nasal pack need admission? A retrospective study of 116 patients managed in accident and emergency according to a peer reviewed protocol.
Van Wyk FC; Massey S; Worley G; Brady S
J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Mar; 121(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 17040607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative study of calcium sodium alginate (Kaltostat) and bismuth tribromophenate (Xeroform) packing in the management of epistaxis.
McGlashan JA; Walsh R; Dauod A; Vowles A; Gleeson MJ
J Laryngol Otol; 1992 Dec; 106(12):1067-71. PubMed ID: 1487662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
