247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16685721)
1. Power-based, phase-informed selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for disease association screens.
Saccone SF; Rice JP; Saccone NL
Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 16685721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FastTagger: an efficient algorithm for genome-wide tag SNP selection using multi-marker linkage disequilibrium.
Liu G; Wang Y; Wong L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():66. PubMed ID: 20113476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ATRIUM: testing untyped SNPs in case-control association studies with related individuals.
Wang Z; McPeek MS
Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):667-78. PubMed ID: 19913122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies.
Zhang K; Qin ZS; Liu JS; Chen T; Waterman MS; Sun F
Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 15078859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
Hao K
Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-marker-LD based genetic algorithm for tag SNP selection.
Mouawad AE; Mansour N
Interdiscip Sci; 2014 Dec; 6(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 25108458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing power of genome-wide association studies by collecting additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Kostem E; Lozano JA; Eskin E
Genetics; 2011 Jun; 188(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21467568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
Stram DO
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linkage disequilibrium maps constructed with common SNPs are useful for first-pass disease association screens.
Taillon-Miller P; Saccone SF; Saccone NL; Duan S; Kloss EF; Lovins EG; Donaldson R; Phong A; Ha C; Flagstad L; Miller S; Drendel A; Lind D; Miller RD; Rice JP; Kwok PY
Genomics; 2004 Dec; 84(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 15533707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linkage disequilibrium grouping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reflecting haplotype phylogeny for efficient selection of tag SNPs.
Takeuchi F; Yanai K; Morii T; Ishinaga Y; Taniguchi-Yanai K; Nagano S; Kato N
Genetics; 2005 May; 170(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 15716494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Similarity in recombination rate and linkage disequilibrium at CYP2C and CYP2D cytochrome P450 gene regions among Europeans indicates signs of selection and no advantage of using tagSNPs in population isolates.
Pimenoff VN; Laval G; Comas D; Palo JU; Gut I; Cann H; Excoffier L; Sajantila A
Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2012 Dec; 22(12):846-57. PubMed ID: 23089684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of SNP density on fine-scale patterns of linkage disequilibrium.
Ke X; Hunt S; Tapper W; Lawrence R; Stavrides G; Ghori J; Whittaker P; Collins A; Morris AP; Bentley D; Cardon LR; Deloukas P
Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Mar; 13(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 14734624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Haplotype block structure and its applications to association studies: power and study designs.
Zhang K; Calabrese P; Nordborg M; Sun F
Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Dec; 71(6):1386-94. PubMed ID: 12439824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilizing HapMap and tagging SNPs.
Haiman CA; Stram DO
Methods Mol Med; 2008; 141():37-54. PubMed ID: 18453083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extent and distribution of linkage disequilibrium in the Old Order Amish.
Van Hout CV; Levin AM; Rampersaud E; Shen H; O'Connell JR; Mitchell BD; Shuldiner AR; Douglas JA
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 34(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19697356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
